ABSTRACT
RT-qPCR on nasopharyngeal swabs is currently the reference COVID-19 diagnosis method. We developed a multiplex RT-ddPCR assay, targeting six SARS-CoV-2 genomic regions, and evaluated it on nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples collected from 130 COVID-19 positive or negative ambulatory individuals, who presented symptoms suggestive of mild or moderate Sars-CoV2 infection. The 6-plex RT-ddPCR assay was shown to have 100% sensitivity on nasopharyngeal swabs and a higher sensibility than RT-qPCR on saliva (85% versus 62%). Saliva samples from 2 individuals with negative results on nasopharyngeal swabs were found to be positive. These results show that multiplex RT-ddPCR should represent an alternative and complementary tool for the diagnosis of COVID-19, in particular to control RT-qPCR ambiguous results, and its application to saliva an appropriate strategy for repetitive sampling and testing individuals for whom nasopharyngeal swabbing is not possible.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the French Defence Innovation Agency (Contract N 2020 68 0918 00 00 00 00)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol was approved by the institutional French ethics committee (2020T3-12_RIPH3 HPS_2020-A00920-39)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Anonymized data relevant to this study and not included here will be made available upon reasonable request.
