ABSTRACT
Background Emergency physicians face considerable workflow challenges due to unpredictable work environments, frequent interruptions, and mounting documentation requirements. Excessive time away from direct patient care is increasingly viewed as detrimental to care quality, communication, and patient safety. This study aimed to quantify and visualize the time emergency physicians spend on specific activities during their clinical shifts, particularly computer usage.
Methods This observational time-motion study was conducted in a high-volume, urban emergency department (ED). An observer used a web-based application to track physician activities including computer use, direct patient care, and all other major tasks carried out on shift. Electronic health record (EHR) event log data was queried to measure computer use after each physician’s scheduled shift. The primary outcome was total minutes of computer time (during and after shift) per scheduled hour of clinical work.
Results The observer tracked 20 emergency physicians for one 8-9h clinical shift each, which generated 150.0 hours of real-time observation data quantifying physicians’ ED workflow. In total, emergency physicians spent a median 29.8 minutes (IQR 25.6-38.5) on the computer per scheduled hour of their ED shift. Physicians spent a median 34.1% of their shift time using the computer and 26.9% with patients. Other activities included verbal communication with staff (15.9%), phone use (9.5%), miscellaneous tasks (5.5%), personal time (3.9%), electrocardiogram review (0.7%), and procedures (0.4%). EHR log analysis showed that physicians spent an additional median 1.3h (IQR 0.5-2.6) using the computer after their scheduled shifts.
Conclusion Emergency physicians spent more than one-third of their ED shift working on the computer, which was more time than they spent with patients. They also spent 1-2 hours using the computer after their shifts. These findings demonstrate the need for strategies aimed at reducing unnecessary computer use during and after clinical shifts to enhance efficiency and improve patient care.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work IRB No: Pro00057066 Approval Date: 4.17.2019
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
