Abstract
Objective To investigate whether the associations between adolescent externalising and internalising mental health difficulties and mid-life health and social outcomes are changing across cohorts.
Methods Data from 31,349 participants followed as part of two prospective national birth cohort studies: 1958 National Child Development Study (n=16091) and the 1970 British Cohort Study (n=15258). Adolescent mental health at age 16 years was assessed using the Rutter scales and operationalised as both a traditional 2-factor internalising and externalising and as a hierarchical bi-factor. Associations between adolescent psychopathology and health and wellbeing (mental health, general health, life satisfaction) and socio-economic (cohabitation, voting behaviour, education and employment) outcomes at ages 42 are estimated and illustrated across cohorts.
Results The prevalence of adolescent mental health difficulties increased between those born in 1958 and 1970. Their associations with different midlife outcomes became more severe or remained similar in the 1970 compared the 1958 cohort. For instance, a stronger association with adolescent mental health difficulties was found for those born in 1970, compared with those born in 1958 for midlife psychological distress (OR 1970=1.82 [1.65;1.99], OR 1958=1.60 [1.43;1.79], cohabitation (OR 1970=0.64 [0.59;0.70], OR 1958=0.74 [1.43;1.79]), and professional occupations (OR 1970=0.75 [0.67;0.84], OR 1958=1.05 [0.88;1.24]). A hierarchical bi-factor approach to modelling adolescent mental health indicated that the associations of externalising symptoms with later outcomes were mainly explained by their shared variance with internalising symptoms.
Conclusion A strengthening trend in the associations of adolescent mental health with adverse mid-life outcomes across two generations highlights the individual and societal burden of adolescent mental health problems might be increasing. If this trend continues to apply to more recently born cohorts, the wide-ranging implications of the increasing prevalence in adolescent mental health difficulties currently observed should be recognised and increased public health efforts to minimise adverse outcomes are needed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
As this study used prospectively collected data from two British birth cohorts this study does not have a trial ID and was not required to be registers.
Funding Statement
We are grateful for the co-operation and participation of the individuals who voluntarily participate in the 1958 and 1970 birth cohort studies. We thank the Economic and Social Research Council for funding these cohorts through the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS) at the UCL Institute of Education, London. We further thank the Economic and Social Research Council for funding the Cross Cohort Research Programme (CCRP) (grant number: ES/M008584/1).We also thank the Medical Research Council (MRC) (grant numbers: MC_UU_12019/1 and MC_UU_12019//3) for funding Marcus Richards. Dr. Praveetha Patalay is supported by a Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund (ISSF3/ H17RCO/NG1). We would also like to thank a large number of stakeholders from academic, policy-maker and funder communities and colleagues at CLS involved in data collection and management. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of this report. We also thank Prof Alissa Goodman (CLS) for her advice on the economic outcome measures used in this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval for each sweep of both the National Child Development Study and the British Cohort Study were received as required.
https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/BCS70-Ethical-review-and-Consent-2019.pdf
https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/NCDS-Ethical-review-and-Consent-2014.pdf
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets used in this research are available for use to all researchers, free of charge, from the UK data service.
