Abstract
Background Cannabidiol (CBD) is being studied as a potential intervention for the people at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR), though the mechanisms underlying its effects are not fully understood. Previous studies indicate that a single dose of CBD can normalize alterations in memory-related brain activation and modulate hippocampal glutamate levels in the early stages of psychosis. This study aimed to examine the acute effects of CBD on the coupling between hippocampal glutamate levels and brain activation during verbal memory in individuals at CHR.
Methods 33 participants at CHR participants were randomly assigned to receive either a single dose of 600 mg CBD (CHR-CBD) or an identical placebo capsule (CHR-PLB). 19 age-matched healthy controls (HC) received no study drugs. Participants underwent MRI scanning while performing a verbal learning task, and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hippocampal glutamate levels. Group x hippocampal glutamate x brain activation interactions were tested.
Results CHR-PLB showed positive correlation between hippocampal glutamate levels and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) (Pcorr. = 0.0039) activation compared to HC during both verbal encoding and recall. Under a single dose of CBD, the glutamate-dlPFC activation coupling was negative and significantly different compared to placebo in CHR individuals (Pcorr. = 0.0001). The reversed correlation in CBD group also observed in the parahippocampal gyrus (Pcorr. = 0.0022) and amygdala (Pcorr. = 0.0019).
Conclusions These findings suggest that the mechanism underlying the effect of CBD in CHR may involve reversing of altered coupling between hippocampal glutamate levels and prefrontal and mediotemporal activation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN46322781
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the grant MR/J012149/1 from the Medical Research Council. YS is supported by a Chinese Scholarship Council studentship with King's College London. SB received support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (NIHR Clinician Scientist Award; NIHR CS-11-001), the NIHR Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust and King's College London. This study represents independent research supported by the NIHR/Wellcome Trust Kings Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The National Research Ethics Service Committee of London Camberwell St Giles institutional on human experimentation gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
