Abstract
Objectives: To explore participant experience and perceived impacts of an online dance-based long COVID support programme. Design: Mixed methods study using thematic analysis of semi structured interviews and structured observations, and ordinal scale questionnaire responses. Setting: Online, community-based, with participants in Scotland and England. Participants: 26 people with self reported long COVID who participated in the final block of 10 sessions were invited to participate in this study. 13 of these consented, 12 female, 7 White British, 10 English as first language, mean(range) age 57yrs (38-77), symptom duration 27months (17-35), and live sessions attended 9.2 (4-17). Two dance leaders also participated in the study. Interventions: An online dance-based long COVID support programme of live sessions, provided in morning and afternoon slots, 30 to 45 minute duration, and online materials to promote wellbeing and self-management strategies, developed by Scottish Ballet, people with long COVID and healthcare professionals. The block of 10 sessions, from which participants were recruited, ran in September-November 2023. Potential participants were required to confirm they were well enough to participate in the programme. Results: Responses to closed questions regarding self-reported impacts demonstrated perceived physical and mental health improvements, the programme surpassed participant expectations, and participants would recommend the programme. Qualitatively, we identified four themes 1. Improved experience of symptoms; 2. Increased confidence regarding movement and physical activity; 3. Feeling calm and refreshed; 4: Valuing time spent in a safe space. Facilitators of impact related to content, logistics, and delivery. Few barriers were described. Dance leaders responses aligned with those of programme participants. Conclusions: A remotely delivered dance-based intervention for supporting people with long COVID is feasible, with participants consistently reporting that they found it enjoyable and beneficial to their health and wellbeing. Further research to assess impact on clinically validated measures is required.
Competing Interest Statement
KEJP was funded by Scottish Ballet to complete this work as part of an external evaluation. However, Scottish Ballet had no involvement in the data collection, analysis, or writing of the manuscript.
Funding Statement
KEJP was supported by the Imperial College National Heart and Lung Institute Clinical Lecturer. KEJP would like to acknowledge the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London for their support. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. KEJP also received funding from Scottish Ballet. Scottish Ballet received funding from The Rayne Foundation to develop the programme. The funders had no say in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Imperial College London Research Ethics Committee (ICREC Reference number: 6533422) on 20/03/23).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data from this study are not being made available for sharing, as given the relatively small number of participants, it would not be possible to anonymise interview transcripts sufficiently.
