Abstract
Background Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with negative health and wellbeing outcomes. Ensuring young people receive timely and appropriate support after experiencing ACEs could improve these outcomes.
Objective This study aimed to explore what works to support young people living with ACEs; what support do they receive, and what are the characteristics of valuable help?
Participants and Setting Young people living in Wales aged 16–18 years (n=559) completed an online survey about their ACEs and the help they did or did not receive with these experiences.
Methods Free text responses were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Co-production workshops with young people were utilised to guide the analytic process.
Results Few participants reported accessing enough support. Five themes were developed: “Help me by helping my family”, “Talking to a trusted adult is helpful… until it’s not”, “Being informed: ‘I was kept in the loop’”, “Schools and colleges as sites of support” and “Loneliness and peer support”.
Conclusions More support is needed for young people with ACEs. Young people find it helpful when their whole family is supported in times of adversity, not blamed. People who provide support should be empathic and non-judgmental. Young people would rather be spoken to about ACEs and ‘kept in the loop’ than have them treated as a taboo or sensitive subject. Experiencing ACEs can be lonely in the absence of peer support. Schools and colleges are acceptable sites of support and may be well placed to provide opportunities for peer support.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the Swansea University Medical School Research Ethics Sub-Committee (Reference 2022-0039).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Author email addresses: Michaela James (m.l.james{at}swansea.ac.uk)
Laura Elizabeth Cowley (l.e.cowley{at}swansea.ac.uk)
Lucy Griffiths (lucy.griffiths{at}swansea.ac.uk)
Mark A. Bellis (m.a.bellis{at}ljmu.ac.uk)
Karen Hughes (karen.hughes18{at}wales.nhs.uk)
Sinead Brophy (s.brophy{at}swansea.ac.uk)
Data Availability
Quantitative data for this study is securely held in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank (SAIL Databank) at Swansea University. The qualitative data associated with this study is available upon request from authors, it has not been uploaded the SAIL because this databank is not optimised for qualitative data.
