Abstract
Abstract Background Malaria results in over 600,000 deaths per year, with 95 percent of all cases occurring in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite significant steady reductions from 2000 to 2015, there has been a recent resurgence. The estimated 2025 Africa death rate was recalculated to be 51.8 people per 100,000, whereas the previous estimate was 15.9. A potential explanation for this very significant setback is that increasing temperatures associated with global warming have made it more difficult to use insecticide treated mosquito nets. This study evaluated a rural west African population to determine barriers to mosquito net use, including heat and outdoor sleeping. Methods This study used a social ecological framework used by the Peace Corps to determine this community’s barriers to malaria prevention. We practiced community-based participatory research by developing and implementing a survey in rural southeast Senegal. Local village health workers were trained specifically to implement this survey. Observations of the mosquito nets and sleeping spaces were performed by surveyors. 164 households in 20 villages were surveyed from October to November of 2012. Results 164 of 164 selected households were surveyed, giving a 100% response rate, representing 21% of this local population. For the 1806 family members, respondents assessed a total need of 1565 nets, implying that each individual in this area needs 0.86 nets (95% CI: 0.77-0.95). The main reasons for not using an available net were heat and fragility of the nets. This population had very positive attitudes regarding mosquito nets and appreciated the work of local malaria educators. Conclusions The estimated need of 0.86 nets per person is 54% higher than the World Health Organization recommendation. Heat was found to be a major barrier in using a mosquito net, causing more people to sleep on outdoor structures. This study’s findings suggest the ratio of nets to people may need to be adjusted for the substantial increase in outdoor sleeping. Head of household responses in this population were found to have no systemic bias and would be an accurate way to assess a family’s need of nets. Deploying more malaria educators to this area would be appreciated and beneficial.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Research Subjects Review Board at the University of Rochester Medical Center, number RSRB00041566. Verbal consent was informed via a script utilized by Rollback Malaria Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group, World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund, MEASURE DHS, MEASURE evaluation and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005 Malaria Indicator Survey. The verbal script was also approved by the University of Rochester Medical Center's Research Subjects Review Board. The surveys had no identifiable information and unique identity numbers, ensuring confidentiality and making this survey minimal risk.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All surveys (without any identifiers) are scanned and in a secure database. These can be made public, if needed.
