Abstract
The goal was to evaluate the performance of a multi-sensor wrist-worn wearable device for generating 12 sleep measures in a diverse cohort. Our study technology was the sleep suite of the Verily Numetric Watch (VNW), using polysomnography (PSG) as reference during 1-night simultaneous recording in a sample of N=41 (18 male, age range: 18-78 years). We performed epoch-by-epoch comparisons for all measures. Key specific analyses were: core accuracy metrics for sleep vs wake classification; bias for continuous measures (Bland-Altman); Cohen’s kappa and accuracy for sleep stage classifications; and mean count difference and linearly weighted Cohen’s kappa for count metric. In addition, we performed subgroup analyses by sex, age, skin tone, body mass index, and arm hair density. Sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of sleep versus wake classification were 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) and 0.66 (0.61, 0.71), respectively. Mean total sleep time bias was 14.55 minutes (1.61, 27.16); wake after sleep onset, −11.77 minutes (−23.89, 1.09); sleep efficiency, 3.15% (0.68, 5.57); sleep onset latency, −3.24 minutes (−9.38, 3.57); light-sleep duration, 3.78 minutes (−7.04, 15.06); deep-sleep duration, 3.91 minutes (−4.59, 12.60); rapid eye movement-sleep duration, 6.94 minutes (0.57, 13.04). Median difference for number of awakenings, 0.00 (0.00, 1.00); and overall accuracy of sleep stage classification, 0.78 (0.51, 0.88). Most measures showed statistically significant proportional biases and/or heteroscedasticity. Subgroup results appeared largely consistent with the overall group, although small samples preclude strong conclusions. These results support the use of VNW’s in classifying sleep versus wake, sleep stages, and for related overnight sleep measures.
Competing Interest Statement
BWN, SSaeb, PB, NV, HA, NS, SSSullivan, SP, ER, RK, SShin report employment and equity ownership in Verily Life Sciences. In addition, SSaeb and NV are listed inventors in a pending patent broadly relevant to the work. MDZ, FB and NA received institutional research funding from Verily Life Sciences for study execution.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Verily Life Sciences
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
WCG Institutional Review Board (20215892) gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data from this study are not available due to the nature of this program. Participants did not consent for their data to be shared publicly.
