Abstract
Background While tension on anastomoses is primarily regarded as a critical factor in anastomotic leaks and failure, assessing this tension is based on subjective surgeon estimation. There is currently no clinically available tool to assess mechanical tension on an anastomosis objectively. Some animal and human studies have previously evaluated anastomotic tension, but no comprehensive review discusses the different methods and types of tension measured.
Objectives To summarize the current state of the literature regarding the measurement and impact of tension on bowel anastomoses.
Design This scoping review was conducted with a systematic search of literature in the PubMed, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases. Key terms used were anastomoses/anastomosis, tension, bowel, surgery, intestine, tissue, small bowel, large bowel, bowel, mucosal tissue, and other corollary terms. Data were synthesized in tables, and summarized paragraphically, with studies assessed using the New-Castle Ottawa scale where possible. Emphasis was placed on method of tension assessment, outcomes, and factors relating to tension.
Results Anastomotic leak and tension are strongly associated, with the presence of tension making leaks up to 10 times more likely. While freedom from tension has traditionally been measured via the surrogate measure of adequate bowel mobilization, this remains a subjective and imprecise method. The literature describes several techniques to allow adequate mobilization, such as splenic flexure mobilization or division of the omentum. However, basing the estimate of tension on subjective assessment has some inherent drawbacks. Animal and cadaveric studies have been the frontier for objective measurement of wall tension, with the use of scaffolds, suture types, and prostheses to bolster the natural tolerance of the bowel. However, these tend to use tensiometers to measure tension, along with automated machines or pulley and ratcheting systems to increase tension in specified intervals. These are universally destructive due to their design of measuring maximal tensile load as well as not being easily adaptable to the operating room.
Conclusions The current literature does not study objective measurement of bowel tension in live human subjects. Bowel mobilization is a common method to reduce tension, but it relies on subjective judgment, which varies between surgeons. Given the recognized importance of tension, developing an objective, safe, intra-operative method to measure bowel wall tension would be a valuable surgical tool.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Update to content, formatting, and compliance with updated PRISMA checklist. Author affiliations and list updated.
Data Availability
All data referenced are available online in the MEDLINE Pubmed database.
