Abstract
Bimodal neuromodulation combining sound therapy with electrical tongue stimulation using the Lenire device is emerging as an effective treatment for tinnitus. A single-arm retrospective chart review analyzes real-world outcomes for 220 tinnitus patients from the Alaska Hearing and Tinnitus Center for the recently FDA-approved Lenire treatment for the first time in a United States clinic. The primary endpoint examines the responder rate and mean change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) after approximately 12 weeks of treatment in eligible patients with moderate or worse tinnitus. A responder represents a THI improvement of greater than seven points (i.e., minimal clinically important difference, MCID). Of 212 patients with available data, there was a high responder rate of 91.5% (95% CI: 86.9%, 94.5%) with a mean improvement of 27.8 ± 1.3 (SEM) points, and no device-related serious adverse events. Furthermore, a THI MCID of seven points represents a consistent criterion for clinical benefit based on real-world evidence.
Competing Interest Statement
EEM is a commercial provider of the Lenire treatment for tinnitus patients, and HHL is a consultant with financial interests for Neuromod Devices.
Funding Statement
The majority of activities were conducted as part of day-to-day clinical operations of the Alaska Hearing and Tinnitus Center, with additional internal funds to support the retrospective chart review tasks. Internal funds to support personnel to assist in retrospective chart review tasks and technical assistance as well as ethics application fees were also provided by Neuromod Devices.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This observational study was reviewed by a registered IRB (Advarra; IRB number: 00000971; Study Protocol number: Pro00077817) and was determined to be exempt from IRB oversight based on the Department of Health and Human Services regulations found at 45 CFR 46.104(d)(4).
[Note: journal guidelines indicated not to include IRB name so in the manuscript the external IRB name of Advarra has been removed]
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data associated with the published study are present in the paper or the Supplementary Information. Access to the raw individual level data may be obtained, contingent on appropriate ethics approval and data sharing agreements, by contacting EEM (clinicaldataqueries{at}neuromoddevics.com) for the purposes of confirming the analysis in the paper. Responses to valid requests will be reasonably attempted and initiated within 10 working days of receipt beginning 3 months and ending 5 years after this article publication.
