Abstract
Aim To compare the different surgical approaches for treating congenital diaphragmatic eventration (CDE) in children.
Methods Retrospective data analysis of a multicentric cohort of pediatric patients operated on for CDE between 2010 and 2021, with comparison of the different surgical approaches and their outcomes.
Results 112 patients, aged 12 [5–21] months, were operated on for CDE. Diaphragmatic plication was performed using thoracoscopy or RATS in 69 (62%) cases, postero-lateral thoracotomy (PLT) in 15 (13%), and using an abdominal approach in 28 (25%). Relief of symptoms was obtained in 88% of the cases and improvement in the diaphragmatic level in 90%. We recorded 31 postoperative complications (28%) and eight recurrences (7%). Compared to other approaches, PLT multiplied the duration of intravenous analgesia by three (96 vs 36h, p<0.0001) and the length of hospital stay by two (8 vs 4d, p=0.002). RATS provided more perioperative hepatic injuries and equivalent short-term results than thoracoscopy, but all five patients remained symptomatic and two of them experienced chest wall deformities.
Conclusion Diaphragmatic plication via a minimally invasive thoracic approach may be the best treatment option for cases of symptomatic CDE. Further is required to confirm that RATS is, at least, not inferior to thoracoscopy.
ClinicalTrial NCT04862494, 2021-04-28;
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ethics committee of the University Hospital Center of Angers gave ethial approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Financial support disclosure: This research received no specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Declarations of interest: None.
Some descriptions have been provided in the material and methods section; tables have been simplified.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
