ABSTRACT
Uncomplicated bacteremic urinary tract infections (bUTIs) are common, often caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis, with most encounters treated empirically. As rates of antimicrobial resistance increase, available antibiotic treatment options are dwindling. Novel antibiotics approved for treating bUTIs are limited, leading to a resurgence of interest in older antibiotics, including fosfomycin. In this study, clinical urine samples from patients diagnosed with bUTIs from a military hospital on the Eastern Seaboard of the United States were tested for susceptibility to fosfomycin and comparator antibiotics, including levofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMS). A total of 1353 nonduplicate bacterial isolates were tested. The majority were Gram-negative, including 605 non-ESBL and 285 ESBL E. coli and 84 non-ESBL and 52 ESBL K. pneumoniae. Fosfomycin susceptibility rates were similar for non-ESBL and ESBL E. coli (95.9% vs 96.1%) and K. pneumoniae (38.1% vs 36.5%). Fosfomycin demonstrated high activity against other Enterobacterales and Gram-positive organisms including Enterobacter faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. Interestingly, most fosfomycin non-susceptible isolates were susceptible to other first-line bUTI treatment options, and most isolates that were non-susceptible to other first-line bUTI treatment option were susceptible to fosfomycin. ESBL K. pneumoniae isolates were the least susceptible to current first-line treatment options. Fosfomycin Etest demonstrated high sensitivity compared to agar dilution, making it a viable method in resource limited areas. Overall, we demonstrated fosfomycin has high activity against common etiologies that cause bUTIs. Further studies investigating the use of fosfomycin in treating non-E. coli bUTI pathogens, as single or combination therapy, is warranted.
IMPORTANCE Uncomplicated bUTI are often caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis, and treated with antibiotics. As rates of antimicrobial resistance increase, the options available for treatment are diminishing. Limited novel antibiotics have entered the market leading to a resurgence of interest in older antibiotics, including fosfomycin. In this study, we investigated the susceptibility of bUTI clinical isolates to fosfomycin and current treatment. Isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin at similar or higher rates compared to comparator antibiotics, especially for isolates that produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. In addition to E. coli and E. faecalis, organisms that fosfomycin is FDA approved for, fosfomycin had high activity against other Enterobacterales and Gram-positive organisms including Staphylococcus aureus. Since most uncomplicated cystitis is treated empirically, fosfomycin is a reasonable treatment option, either single agent or in combination, supporting the need for randomized control trials to approve treatment of other etiologies, and harmonizing breakpoints across agencies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Tripler Army Medical Center Human Research Protection Office, The Market Director, Defense Health Agency-Hawaii Market, and Tripler Army Medical Center Command provided all necessary authority to conduct this study under protocol #TAMC 23N32.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
