Abstract
Deploying community health workers (CHWs) is a vital strategy to improve health at a community level in low- and middle-income countries. Whilst there is substantial evidence on the effectiveness of CHWs interventions, there is a need for more research on the mechanisms through which these interventions work. Understanding the acceptability of these interventions is one way of assessing the mechanisms through which they work. This article examines the acceptability of a community health worker-led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients based on the perspectives of the CHWs, community nurses and diabetes and hypertensive patients. A qualitative study was imbedded within a cluster randomized trial to assess the effectiveness community health worker-led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 3 community health nurses and 15 diabetes and hypertension patients as well as 2 focus group discussions with CHWs. Data were analyzed manually using the thematic analysis method. There was consensus that the intervention had many benefits amongst CHWs and community nurses. However, among patients, there were mixed perceptions regarding the benefits of the intervention. The main challenges that were mentioned by CHWs include resistance to advice by patients, insufficient resources, and lack of acceptance at some of the patient’s homes. All participants believed the intervention was acceptable. Our study provides vital information that should be considered in upscaling CHW led interventions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was financially supported by the Fogarty International Center and National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number D43 TW011968. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval was granted by the Joint Research Ethics Committee for University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences and the Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals (Ref: JREC 339/ 2022) as well as the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (Ref: MRCZ/A/3059)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
