Abstract
Background Pregnancy outcomes are determined by the type of antenatal care a woman receives. The purpose of this review was to conduct a critical analysis of the literature on the provision of holistic antenatal care to pregnant women.
Design A systematic research review was employed for the study.
Data Sources A search of EBSCO Host, Google Scholar, Sabinet, and Science Direct databases was performed. After reviewing 150 paper titles and abstracts, 14 studies were found to meet the final criteria for quality assessment. Included were only English-language papers published from 2020 to 2023.
Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies Quantitative, Qualitative, Review studies, Quasi-experimental, and cohort studies. Papers had to include adults (>18 years old), and pregnant women attending antenatal care at different health facilities worldwide and published in peer-reviewed journals from 2020 onwards.
Results Four of the fourteen analysed articles focused on socioeconomic status, three on staff attitudes, age, parity, and religion, and one on infrastructure. Six studies focused on midwives ’role in providing holistic antenatal care. These factors impacted pregnant women’s ability to receive comprehensive antenatal care. Three studies on woman-centered care and three on focused antenatal care have also come to light to enhance midwives’ capacity to deliver comprehensive prenatal care.
Conclusion Healthcare facilities should offer an environment where communities may learn about the importance of antenatal care visits and how to ensure pregnant women obtain acceptable treatments.
Implications This study demonstrates the necessity for healthcare providers to be resourceful about offering holistic antenatal care to pregnant women to enhance outcomes for both mothers and newborns.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study received no funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The author can give the data supporting the study's findings upon request.
