Abstract
Aim To determine the specific movement features in children with cerebral palsy (CP) that prompt expert identification of dystonia
Methods Dystonia identification in CP, particularly when co-morbid with spasticity, can be difficult. For this retrospective case-control study, we conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of consensus-building discussions between three pediatric movement disorders physicians as they attempted to identify the presence or absence of dystonia in gait videos of 40 subjects with spastic CP and periventricular leukomalacia.
Results Initial unanimous consensus regarding the presence or absence of dystonia was achieved in 12 videos (30%). Following consensus building discussion, 22 additional videos (55%) yielded unanimous consensus. Two main themes were generated: 1) Unilateral leg or foot adduction that was variable over time, and 2) Difficulty in identifying dystonia. Codes contributing to Theme 1 were more likely to appear when a discussant was favoring the presence of dystonia in a video (Chi-square, p=0.004).
Discussion These results provide specific movement features that could aid dystonia diagnosis in ambulatory children with CP. However, these results also suggest that, even amongst putative motor phenotyping experts, visual dystonia diagnosis in CP remains difficult, highlighting the need for developing and using objective dystonia diagnosis measures.
What this paper adds
- Dystonia identification is visually difficult, even for experts
- Unilateral lower extremity variable adduction could represent gait dystonia in cerebral palsy
- Qualitative thematic analysis objectively identifies expert-cited dystonia features in cerebral palsy
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding supporting this work is from the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5K12NS098482-02).
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data will be made available to qualified investigators upon request.