Abstract
Background The study tests whether financial hardship and uncertainty have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and the early stage of the subsequent cost-of-living crisis and whether these might explain increased psychological distress among the UK population.
Methods We derive two cohorts from Understanding Society, a study representative of the UK population. Cohort 1 (C1) starts in 2016 and includes a 3-year follow-up until 2019. Cohort 2 (C2) starts in 2019 and ends in 2022. We provide descriptive statistics on financial hardship and uncertainty and apply parallel Latent Growth Modelling (LGM) on each cohort to explain variations in psychological distress (GHQ-36) based on baseline and follow-up financial trajectories. The sample is adjusted using cross-sectional weights and inverse probability weights for attrition.
Results Financial hardship rates do not differ across cohorts but a marginal increase of 10 percent in financial uncertainty is observed in 2022 for C2. No significant difference in associations is observed across cohorts in the LGM with constant financial hardship increasing the GHQ-36 slope by 0.89 (95%CI=0.76;1.02) and 0.89 (95%CI=0.73;1.05) units in C1 and C2 and constant financial uncertainty increasing it respectively by 0.95 (95%CI=0.74;1.17) and 1.04 (95%CI=0.82;1.25). Baseline hardship and uncertainty increase the intercept by 2.39 (95%CI=2.11;2.67) and 1.74 (195%CI=1.38;2.10) in C1 and 2.97 (95%CI=2.65;3.29) and 2.12 (95%CI=1.75;2.49) in C2.
Discussion The uncertainty caused by the 2022 cost-of-living crisis might have contributed to increase psychological distress within the UK population. Stronger detrimental effects might be expected if financial hardship were to increase.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors report no conflict of interest. Jacques Wes is a member of the Belgian Health Data Agency (HDA) user committee.
Funding Statement
JW is the PI of the Horizon Europe ERC Starting Grant UHealth (Trade Unions and Workers Health), the PI of the Negotiating Health: addressing the role of trade unions in explaining workers physical and mental health (NegHealth) Incentive Grant for Scientific Research funded by the Belgian National Scientific fund (FNRS) and the PI of the Trade unions, job satisfaction and workers health: an international comparison of panel data Joint Usage and Research Center Program at the Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Japan.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study uses Understanding Society data that can be accessed through the UK data archive portal: https://www.data-archive.ac.uk.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This version of the manuscript has been revised to update the following: 1/ Develop a LGM framework that compares two Understanding Society cohorts in capture potential changes in associations between financial hardship and uncertainty and psychological distress within two different contexts (pre-Covid and during the COVID-19 pandemic and the cost of living crisis). 2/ Use GHQ-36 as a linear variable and not on a binary basis. 3/ Use the two cohorts to provide descriptives statistics on financial hardship and uncertainty in 2016-2019 (cohort 1) and 2019-2022 (cohort 2). 4/ Move to the appendix the longer descriptive trends in GHQ-caseeness, financial hardship and financial uncertainty that at the start of the result section.
Data Availability
The study uses Understanding Society data that can be accessed through the UK data archive portal: https://www.data-archive.ac.uk.
