Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2, is associated with a significant increase in risk of many cancers. In last years, various studies suggested that obese cancer patients have better outcomes than non-obese patients. This phenomenon, also known as “the obesity paradox”, is not well understood and presents controversial explanations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between obesity and outcome after a diagnosis of cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from inception to January 2020, for studies reporting prognosis of patients with obesity and cancer. Risk of death, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression were pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval (HR 95%CI). The primary outcome of the study refers to overall survival (OS) in obese vs non-obese patients with malignancies. Secondary endpoints were CSS and progression- or disease-free survival (PFS or RFS).
RESULTS Mortality and relapse associated with obesity in patients with cancer were evaluated among n=6,320,365 participants (n=203 studies). Overall, association of obesity and cancer was associated with a reduced OS (HR =1.14, 95% CI: 1.09-1.19; P<.01) and CSS (HR=1.17, 95%CI 1.12-1.23; P<.01). Patients were also at increased risk for relapse (HR=1.13, 95%CI 1.07-1.19; P<.01). Patients with breast, colorectal and uterine tumors were at increased risk of death. Conversely, obese with lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma and melanoma survived longer that non-obese.
CONCLUSIONS In many cancer patients, obesity reduces survival and increases the risk of relapse. In lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma and melanoma obesity was protective in terms of outcome. More intensive follow up, adequate dosing of oncological treatments, calories intake restrictions, physical activity and monitoring of obesity-related complications are effective measures for reducing mortality in these subjects.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Not applicable
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Not applicable
