ABSTRACT
Introduction Estimates of Within-Subject and between subject biological variation in South Asia are sorely lacking. Therefore, we attempted to estimate the short-term estimates of the same for Differential Counts (DC).
Methods The study was conducted on twenty eight healthy volunteers (15 males and 13 females). After morning collection of blood in K3-EDTA vials analysis was conducted in triplicate on the Sysmex XN-1000 analyzer for six consecutive days. The Within subject, between subject and analytical coefficient of variation of the DC was calculated from the results by nested repeated measures ANOVA after outlier exclusion. The Reference change values (RCV) were also calculated.
Results The within-subject variation for Eosinophil Count in our group from South Asia was greater than the published European and American studies. The between-subject variation in monocytes and basophils were also increased. Males and females showed similar biological variation for DC. The Within-subject variation of other parameters (Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes and Basophils) were similar or showed only mild differences to the published studies.
Conclusion The markedly different within-subject variation for Eosinophil counts suggest that the RCV for DC in South Asians need to be different from the published data in order to have clinical relevance. The Within-subject variation values of the other parameters seem transportable from the published European and American studies, but small differences found mean that further regional estimates need to be found for robust evidence of the same.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NOT APPLICABLE
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences through its intramural funding under Grant IM/RC117/2017/05
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data incorporated with this manuscript
