ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives Moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury patients commonly manifest vestibular dysfunction with imbalance and dizziness. Importantly, falls in these patients are linked to long-term unemployment and increased mortality. There are however no objective acute-prospective longitudinal data of vestibular outcomes nor of the mechanisms predicting vestibular recovery. We previously showed that in acute traumatic brain injury, acute imbalance was linked to impaired vestibular perception of self-motion (i.e. vestibular agnosia) via right inferior longitudinal fasciculus disruption. This report importantly could not inform upon the predictors nor neural substrates of vestibular recovery, questions which we focus upon in this first acute-longitudinal study assessing objective vestibular recovery in traumatic brain injury, with detailed clinical, laboratory and neuroimaging measures.
Methods We screened 918 hospitalized traumatic brain injury patients, recruiting 39 acutely (18 – 65 age) with preserved peripheral vestibular function confirmed via vestibular ocular reflex testing (patients 2.52°/s versus controls 1.78°/s; P > 0.05) of which 34 patients (17 with vestibular agnosia) completed the follow-up testing. Common inner ear and migraine diagnoses were treated to resolution pre-testing. Vestibular perceptual thresholds were assessed via whole-body rotations in the dark on a computerized rotating chair. Using k-means clustering, vestibular perceptual thresholds of healthy controls and patients were compared resulting in 1.99 °/s/s or above being classified as vestibular agnosia. Balance was assessed via force platform.
Results The change in vestibular perceptual thresholds and sway from acute to follow-up was linked (P < 0.05) and a logistic model indicated (P < 0.05) that those who had acute vestibular agnosia made worse recovery of vestibular mediated function (balance and vestibular perception) as compared to non-vestibular agnosia patients. Moreover, subjective symptoms of imbalance and dizziness (via ‘Dizziness Handicap Inventory’) were not linked to objective vestibular recovery of balance and perception (P > 0.05). Neuroimaging findings indicated that the linked vestibular recovery (from vestibular agnosia and imbalance) was mediated by bihemispheric fronto-posterior circuits particularly frontal poles and splenium of corpus callosum.
Conclusion Acute vestibular agnosia predicts worse recovery of imbalance and linked recovery of vestibular agnosia and is mediated by partially overlapping, bi-hemispheric circuits. Since vestibular dysfunction may occur without vertigo complaint (from vestibular agnosia), clinical and research assessment of vestibular recovery should assess objective vestibular measures in addition to dizziness symptoms, which poorly track central vestibular recovery. Finally, our cohort were young and without medical co-morbidities, hence understanding the additional impacts of ageing and multimorbidity is required in vestibular recovery in traumatic brain injury cohorts.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Medical Research Council (MRC) (MR/P006493/1). The Imperial Health Charity, The NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowship (R. Smith - ICA-CDRF-2017-03-070), The US Department of Defense - Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP), The Jon Moulton Charity Trust.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval was obtained from London-Harrow research ethics committee (17/LO/0434).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
