Abstract
Background Little is known about public perceptions of antivirals for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in the United States (US). Our objective was to explore adult perceptions toward COVID-19 antivirals with the goal of improving outreach communications about antivirals for COVID-19.
Methods During July 2022, potential respondents 18 years and older were randomly sampled from a national opt-in, non-representative, cross-sectional internet panel, with oversampling of African Americans, Hispanics, and adults 65 years and older. Respondents were asked about sociodemographic factors, and knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding COVID-19 antivirals. Results were weighted to represent the non-institutionalized US adult population.
Results Among 1,155 respondents, 51% were female, 60% were 18-49 years, 21% were 50-64 years, and 19% were 65 years or older. Compared to those aged 18-49 years and 50-64 years, a greater proportion of adults 65 years and older were knowledgeable about COVID-19 antivirals and would take them if they tested positive or their doctor recommended them. Adults 65 years and over and those reporting immunosuppression or disability had the highest rates of willingness to take antivirals. For all groups, the proportion of people willing to take antivirals increased by >20% if recommended by their doctor. Respondents in the 50-64 and 65+ groups who were sure they would take COVID-19 antivirals were more likely to be fully vaccinated and less likely to be living in isolation.
Conclusion Groups that are less likely to have been vaccinated, those living in isolation, and those not sure about whether they would take an antiviral or not may be at risk for not receiving treatment to prevent severe COVID-19 outcomes. However, trust in doctor recommendations may be enough to overcome individual patient concerns about COVID-19 antivirals. Targeted initiatives to educate those at risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes about the effectiveness of antivirals, including those who are unvaccinated given their increased risk of severe disease, may be needed to further lower this population’s risk of severe COVID-19.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded through a contract between the National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases Office of Communications and KRC Research
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Abstract results section clarified to better summarize main results; Outcomes section updated to clarify Coefficient selection cut-off and interpretation; Discussion edited to clarify how findings could be used to target messaging and interventions to potentially receptive groups and possibly improve COVID-19 antiviral use; Table 1 edited to clarify comparison groups; Tables 2a, 2b, 2c edited to clarify analytic characteristics such as model type, variables, and reference groups.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
