Abstract
Purpose Recent guidance has resulted in an increased level of interest in the wellbeing of children and young people, including those with complex needs. Evaluation of quality of life in this population is notoriously difficult, but has become increasingly vital when assessing the value of a service.
Methods A previously validated tool, Quality of life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability), was used in conjunction with parental reports on quality-of-life measures for children and young people before and after 6 and 12 months of attending specialist leisure activities provided by a charity (Sparkle) at children’s centres in South Wales.
Results QI-Disability scores improved overall after 6 and 12 months of attending Sparkle club activities. However, the only statistically significant improvement was in the QI-Disability positive emotions domain. Parental reports also confirmed that children and young people were making progress towards their personal goals.
Conclusion Collecting evaluation data within real-world services is challenging but essential. This paper uses quality-of-life measures to demonstrate how leisure activities provided by Sparkle improve scores for children with disabilities, including evidence of the perceived value for children, young people and parents.
Plain English summary There is little previous research evaluating specialist leisure activities provided for children and young people with disabilities within real-world services. This evaluation aimed to find out if specialist leisure activities improved wellbeing scores for children with complex needs. We used parent-report questionnaires to measure changes to children’s quality of life whilst accessing these leisure activities. We found there is a benefit to children and young people with complex needs and their families when they participate in specialist leisure activities, and children experienced more positive emotions after accessing for 6 months.
Competing Interest Statement
One of the authors is employed and funded by Sparkle (South Wales), the registered charity (1093690) that delivers the service evaluated during this research. Another author is an unsalaried Trustee of the charity. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding Statement
No funding was received to conduct this evaluation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Research Risk Review Panel of Aneurin Bevan University Health Board Research and Development Department gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
nicole.mcgrath2{at}wales.nhs.uk
fiona.astill{at}wales.nhs.uk
sabinemaguire{at}gmail.com
kempam{at}cardiff.ac.uk
hurtl{at}cardiff.ac.uk
Data Availability
Data produced in the present study are not openly available due to lack of participant consent to open the data.
