Abstract
Objective To examine the efficacy of school-based e-cigarette preventive interventions via a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data sources We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane and clinical trials registries for studies published between January 2000-June 2023 using keywords for e-cigarettes, adolescents, and school.
Study selection Of 1566 double-screened records, 11 met criteria of targeting adolescents, evaluating an e-cigarette preventive intervention, being conducted in a secondary school, using a randomised controlled trial (RCT), cluster RCT or quasi-experimental design, and comparing an intervention to a control.
Data extraction Pre-specified data pertaining to the study design, outcomes, and quality were extracted by one reviewer and confirmed by a second, and where necessary, third reviewer.
Data synthesis Our narrative synthesis showed some school-based interventions prevented or reduced e-cigarette and/or tobacco use, however some increased use. Meta-analyses on a subsample of studies found that, overall, school-based interventions were not associated with the prevention of e-cigarette (OR=0.43, 95%CI=0.16, 1.12; p=0.09) or tobacco (OR=1.01, 95%CI=0.65, 1.59, p=0.95) use, however were associated with reductions in past 30-day tobacco use (OR=0.59, 95%CI=0.39, 0.89, p=0.01) which encompassed e-cigarettes in some studies. School-based interventions were also associated with improved knowledge (SMD=-0.38, 95%CI=-0.68, -0.08, p=0.01), intentions (SMD=-0.15, 95%CI=-0.22, -0.07, p=0.0001), and attitudes (SMD=-0.14, 95%CI=-0.22, -0.06; p=0.0007) in the short-term. Overall, the quality of evidence was low-to-moderate.
Conclusions School-based interventions hold potential for addressing e-cigarette use, however, can have null or iatrogenic effects. More high-quality research is needed to develop efficacious interventions, and schools must be supported to adopt evidence-based programs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Paul Ramsay Foundation (award/grant number N/A). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
amy-leigh.rowe{at}sydney.edu.au, nicola.newton{at}sydney.edu.au, lyra.egan{at}sydney.edu.au, e.hunter{at}sydney.edu.au, emma.devine{at}sydney.edu.au, tess.aitken{at}sydney.edu.au, louise.thornton{at}sydney.edu.au, maree.teesson{at}sydney.edu.au, emily.stockings{at}sydney.edu.au, katrina.champion{at}sydney.edu.au
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
