Abstract
Background The 1-HMR metabolomics-based MetaboHealth score, comprised of 14 serum metabolic markers, associates with disease-specific mortality, but it is unclear whether the score also reflects cognitive changes and functional impairment.
Objectives Assess the associations between the MetaboHealth score with cognitive and daily functioning, and cognitive and functional decline in older people at increased cardiovascular risk.
Methods 5292 older people free of dementia at baseline with mean age 75.3 years (standard deviation=3.4) from the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly (PROSPER). MetaboHealth score was measured at baseline, and cognitive function and functional independence were measured at baseline and every 3 months during up to 2.5-years follow-up. Cognitive function was assessed using the Stroop test (selective attention), the Letter Digit Coding test (LDCT) (processing speed), and the two versions of the Picture Learning test (delayed and immediate; memory). Two tests of functional independence were used: Barthel Index (BI) and instrumental activities at daily living (IADL).
Results A higher MetaboHealth score was associated with worse cognitive function (in all domains) and with worse functional independence. For example, after full adjustments, a 1-SD higher MetaboHealth score was associated with 9.02 (95%CI 7.29, 10.75) seconds slower performance on the Stroop test and 2.79 (-3.26,-2.21) less digits coded on the LDCT. During follow-up, 1-SD higher MetaboHealth score was associated with an additional decline of 0.53 (0.23,0.83) seconds on the Stroop test and -0.08 (-0.11,-0.06) points on the IADL.
Conclusion Metabolic disturbance, as reflected by an increased metabolomics-based health score, may mark future cognitive and functional decline.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Medical Ethics Committee (METC) of the Leiden University Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work. The University Ethics Committee of the University of Glasgow gave ethical approval for this work. The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Cork Teaching Hospitals gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
