Abstract
When people talk, they move their hands to enhance meaning. Here we ask whether people spontaneously use their artificial limbs (prostheses) to gesture, and whether prosthesis gesture behaviour relates to everyday prosthesis use and perceived embodiment. One-handed participants with congenital and acquired hand loss and two-handed controls participated in gesture-facilitating tasks, measured using acceleration monitors and further validated with offline video coding. Everyday functional prosthesis use and perceived prosthesis embodiment were assessed using questionnaires. Perhaps surprisingly, one- and two-handed participants did not differ in the amount of gestures they produced. However, they did differ in their gesture profile. One-handers performed more, and bigger, movements with their intact hand while gesturing relative to their prosthesis, whereas two-handers produced more equal movements across hands. Importantly, one-handers who incorporated their prosthesis more into gesturing, that is — produced gestures that were more similar to their two-handed counterparts — also showed more frequent prosthesis use in day-to-day life. Although as a group, one-handers only marginally agreed that their prosthesis feels like a body-part, people reporting positive embodiment also showed great prosthesis habits, both for communication and daily function. We propose that measuring gesture behaviour in prosthesis-users can be used as an implicit and objective clinical tool to monitor and assess successful prosthesis adoption.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship (215575/Z/19/Z), and an ERC Starting Grant (715022 EmbodiedTech) and a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (104128/Z/14/Z), awarded to T.R.M. M.MacS is funded by a Wellcome Trust Fellowship [100229/Z/12/Z].
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data will be available shortly at the Open Science Framework
