Abstract
Ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission and COVID-19 disease severity is influenced by immunity acquired by natural exposure and/or vaccination, whereby most vaccines are formulated on the Ancestral strain. However, population-level immunity is complicated by the emergence of variants of concern (VOCs), such as Omicron that is the dominant variant currently in circulation. Antibody Fc-dependent effector functions are being increasingly recognised as important mediators in immunity, especially against VOCs. However, induction of these functions in populations with diverse infection and/or vaccination histories, remains poorly defined. Here, we evaluated Fc-dependent functional antibodies following vaccination with two widely used vaccines: AstraZeneca (AZ; ChAdOx1-S) and Sinovac (SV). We quantified FcγR-binding and C1q-fixing antibodies against Ancestral and variant spike (S) proteins in Brazilian adults vaccinated with AZ or SV (n=222), some of which were previously exposed to SARS-CoV-2. AZ induced greater FcγR-binding responses to Ancestral S than the SV vaccine. Previously exposed individuals had significantly greater vaccine-induced responses compared to their naïve counterparts, with notably high C1q-fixation levels, irrespective of vaccine type. FcγR-binding was highest among AZ vaccinated individuals with a prior exposure, and these responses were well retained against the Omicron S protein. Overall, these findings contribute to our understanding of vaccine-induced immunity and its effectiveness against evolving variants.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Investigator Grant to JGB) and Burnet Institute. The Burnet Institute received funding from the Independent Research Institutes Infrastructure Support Scheme of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, and the Operational Infrastructure Scheme of the Victorian State Government, Australia.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of National Commission on Research Ethics of UERJ, Brazil, and Alfred Human Research and Ethics Committee, Australia, gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors