ABSTRACT
Background Tinnitus is defined as the perception of a sound without a corresponding external acoustic stimulus and is considered a symptom rather than a disease. In some individuals, it can be evoked or modulated by input from the somatosensory, somatomotor, and visual-motor systems. This has led to the introduction of the term: ‘‘somatosensory modulation of tinnitus’’. In these cases, the psychoacoustic attributes of tinnitus (loudness and pitch) can change as a result of external stimuli such as strong contractions of the muscles of the head, neck, limbs, orofacial movements, and eye movements. The temporomandibular joint and cervical spine, along with the head, appear to be the musculoskeletal anatomical regions most commonly underlying somatic tinnitus. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of somatosensory modulation of the cervical spine and temporomandibular joint in subjects with tinnitus.
Methods The databases investigated for the review were: Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Observational studies investigating the prevalence of somatosensory modulation of the cervical spine and temporomandibular joint in subjects with tinnitus were included. No time limit was entered into the search and no age or language restrictions were applied.
Results 14 studies met the eligibility criteria on which the review was based. In 5 studies, the prevalence of tinnitus modulation was reported with one or more maneuvers involving TMJ, in 3 studies with one or more maneuvers involving the cervical spine and 7 studies reported the prevalence of modulation following maneuvers for both somatic regions.
Conclusion The present study confirmed that tinnitus perception and intensity can be somatically modulated in a subpopulation of individuals. The cervical spine and the ATM play a key role in the modulation of tinnitus and, based on the data collected on individual districts, the ATM appears to be the most frequently involved somatic region.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Source data was openly available prior to study initiation. The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: Pubmed, Scopus, Web of scince and Embase. - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov - https://www.scopus.com - https://apps.webofknowledge.com/ - https://www.embase.com
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors