ABSTRACT
Background Leukemia, a cancer impacting blood-forming tissues such as bone marrow and the lymphatic system, presents in various forms, affecting children and adults differently. The therapeutic approach is complex and depends on the specific leukemia type. Effective management is crucial as it disrupts normal blood cell production, increasing infection susceptibility. Treatments like chemotherapy can further weaken immunity. Thus, a patient’s healthcare plan should focus on comfort, reducing chemotherapy side effects, protecting veins, addressing complications, and offering educational and emotional support.
Method This article reviews studies on the combined use of drugs for treating leukemia. Employing a mix of medicines might decrease the chances of tumor resistance. Starting multiple drugs concurrently allows for immediate application during disease onset, avoiding delays. Initial chemotherapy uses a drug combination to eliminate maximum leukemia cells and restore normal blood counts. Afterwards, intensification chemotherapy targets any residual, undetectable leukemia cells in the blood or bone marrow. To recommend a drug combination to treat/manage Leukemia, under first step of RAIN protocol, we have searched articles including related trend drugs using Natural Language Processing. In the second step, we have employed Graph Neural Network to pass information between these trending drugs and genes that act as potential targets for Leukemia.
Result As a result, the Graph Neural network recommends combining Tretinoin, Asparaginase, and Cytarabine. The network meta-analysis confirmed the effectiveness of these drugs on associated genes.
Conclusion The p-value between leukemia and the scenario that includes combinations of the mentioned drugs is almost zero, indicating an improvement in leukemia treatment. Reviews of clinical trials on these medications support this claim.
Highlights
Combined drugs that make p-value between Leukemia and target proteins/genes close to 1
Using Graph Neural network to recommend drug combination
A Network meta-analysis to measure the comparative efficacy
Considered drug interactions
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Abbreviations
- STROBE
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology
- PRISMA
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
- RAIN
- Systematic Review and Artificial Intelligence Network Meta-Analysis
