Abstract
Background Animal models indicate GABAergic dysfunction in the development of psychosis, and that benzodiazepine (BDZ) exposure can prevent the emergence of psychosis-relevant phenotypes. However, whether BDZ exposure influences the risk of psychosis in humans is unknown.
Methods This observational-cohort study used electronic health record data from 818 individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) to investigate whether BDZ exposure (including hypnotics e.g., zopiclone) reduces the risk of developing psychosis and adverse clinical outcomes. Cox proportional-hazards models were employed in both the whole-unmatched sample, and a propensity score matched (PSM) subsample.
Results 567 CHR-P individuals were included after data cleaning (105 BDZ-exposed, 462 BDZ-unexposed). 306 (54%) individuals were male, and the mean age was 22.3 years (SD 4.9). The BDZ-exposed and BDZ-unexposed groups differed on several demographic and clinical characteristics, including psychotic symptom severity. In the whole-unmatched sample, BDZ exposure was associated with increased risk of transition to psychosis (HR=1.61; 95%CI:1.03-2.52; P=0.037), psychiatric hospital admission (HR=1.93; 95%CI:1.13-3.29; P=0.017), home visit (HR=1.64; 95%CI:1.18-2.28; P=0.004), and A&E attendance (HR=1.88; 95%CI:1.31-2.72; P<0.001). However, after controlling for confounding-by-indication through PSM, BDZ exposure did not modulate the risk of any outcomes (all P>0.05). In analysis restricted to antipsychotic-naïve individuals, BDZ exposure reduced the risk of transition to psychosis at trend-level (HR=0.59; 95%CI:0.32-1.08; P=0.089).
Conclusions BDZ exposure in CHR-P individuals was not associated with a reduction in the risk of psychosis transition or other adverse clinical outcomes. Results in the whole-unmatched sample suggest BDZ prescription may be more likely in CHR-P individuals with higher symptom severity.
Competing Interest Statement
RAM has received speaker/consultancy fees from Karuna, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Otsuka, and is director of a company that hosts psychotropic prescribing decision tools. AAG has received speaker/consultancy fees from Lundbeck, Pfizer, Otsuka, Asubio, Autifony, Janssen, Alkermes, SynAgile, Merck, and Newron. GM has received consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. PFP has received honoraria or grant fees from Lundbeck, Angelini and Menarini in the past 36 months. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding Statement
NRL is supported by a PhD studentship from the Medical Research Council Doctoral Training Partnership. This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust & The Royal Society [Sir Henry Dale Fellowship 202397/Z/16/Z to GM]. RAMs work is funded by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Career Development (224625/Z/21/Z). AAG's work is funded by a United States Public Health Service Grant (NIMH MH57440).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was granted by South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Psychosis Clinical Academic Group (PSYAUD17_25)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
There is no ethical permission for data or research material sharing. Code is available upon request.