Abstract
Background/ aims Little is known about the experience of people post-stroke and their informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to understand the challenges faced by people post-stroke and informal caregivers during the pandemic, as well as the impact on their healthcare support, lifestyle, and self-care behaviors.
Methods A multi-perspective qualitative study was undertaken, with semi-structured interviews being carried out to sixteen participants: eight stroke patients and eight informal caregivers, mostly performed online. Reflexive thematic analysis was used, with data being independently coded and categorized before consolidated into themes and subthemes.
Findings Three themes were derived from the data analysis: i) Perceived impact of COVID-19 pandemic, ii) What helped? - strategies to manage the distress provoked by COVID-19, and iii) The value of rehabilitation and physical activity, with findings highlighting the negative psychological impact of the pandemic. In response to the perceived lack of support and access to health and social services, participants highlighted the use of digital approaches and professional support.
Conclusions Findings suggest the importance of self-management support and/or digital content in order to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. The involvement of peers, family members, friends or others seems to be an important strategy to increase motivation in remote rehabilitation and physical activity.
Key points
- Due to the impact of COVID-19 on people post-stroke and informal caregivers’ daily routines, both highlighted the importance of finding new and alternative ways of communicating, which included the use of digital approaches.
- For some informal caregivers the pandemic was perceived as an opportunity to spend more time with the family and with the person with stroke.
- People post-stroke admit having decreased their levels of physical activity during COVID-19 and increased the value given to rehabilitation and physical activity.
- Involving peers or others, digitally or in-person, seems to be an important strategy when planning physical activity recommendations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of the Health School of the Polytechnique Institute of Setubal gave ethical approval for this work (66/AFC/2020).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.