ABSTRACT
Background Dolutegravir is now recommended for second-line anti-retroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries. We compared outcomes with dolutegravir (DTG) versus the previous lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) regimen in South Africa.
Methods We used routinely collected, de-identified data from 59 South African clinics. We included people living with HIV aged ≥ 15 years with virologic failure (two consecutive viral loads ≥1000 copies/mL) on first-line tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based ART and switched to second-line ART. We used modified Poisson regression models to compare outcomes of 12-month retention-in-care and viral suppression (<50 copies/ml) after switching to second-line regimens of zidovudine (AZT), emtricitabine/lamivudine (XTC), DTG and TDF/XTC/DTG and AZT/XTC/LPV/r.
Findings Of 1214 participants, 729 (60.0%) were female, median age was 36 years (interquartile range 30 to 42), 689 (56.8%) were switched to AZT/XTC/LPV/r, 217 (17.9%) to AZT/XTC/DTG and 308 (25.4%) to TDF/XTC/DTG. Retention-in-care was higher with AZT/XTC/DTG (85.7%, adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.27; adjusted risk difference (aRD) 10.89%, 95%CI 2.01 to 19.78) but not different with TDF/XTC/DTG (76.9%, aRR 1.01, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.10; aRD 1.04%, 95%CI -5.03 to 7.12) compared to AZT/XTC/LPV/r (75.2%). Retention-in-care with TDF/XTC/DTG was not statistically significantly different from AZT/XTC/DTG (aRR 0.89, 95%CI 0.78 to 1.01; aRD - 9.85%, 95%CI -20.33 to 0.63). Of 799 participants who were retained-in-care with a 12-month viral load, viral suppression was higher with AZT/XTC/DTG (59.3%, aRR 1.25, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.47; aRD 11.57%, 95%CI 2.37 to 20.76) and TDF/XTC/DTG (60.7%, aRR 1.30, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.48; aRD 14.16%, 95%CI 7.14 to 21.18) than with the AZT/XTC/LPV/r regimen (46.7%).
Interpretation DTG-based second-line regimens were associated with similar or better retention-in-care and better viral suppression than the LPV/r-based regimen. TDF/XTC/DTG had similar viral suppression compared to AZT/XTC/DTG.
Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Africa Oxford Initiative.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by funding from the Africa Oxford Initiative (AfiOx-160), the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (2021-ISG-Y1-10004), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-051067).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of the University of Kwazulu-Natal (BE646/17), the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Health Research Ethics Committee (KZ_201807_021), the TB/HIV Information Systems Data Request Committee, and the eThekwini Municipality Health Unit.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email addresses of authors YS: yukteshwar.sookrajh{at}durban.gov.za, JvM: johan.molen{at}caprisa.org, TK: thokozani.32khubone{at}durban.gov.za, LL: lara.lewis{at}caprisa.org, RJL: lessellsr{at}ukzn.ac.za, KN: kogie.naidoo{at}caprisa.org, PS: cedrick.sosibo{at}durban.gov.za, RvH: rosemary.vanheerden{at}durban.gov.za, NG: nigel.garrett{at}caprisa.org, JD: jienchi.dorward{at}phc.ox.ac.uk
Data Availability
We cannot publicly share the data used for this analysis because of the legal and ethical requirements regarding the use of routinely collected clinical data in South Africa. Interested parties can request access to the data from the eThekwini Municipality Health Unit and the South African National Department of Health TB/HIV Information System (contact details obtainable upon request to JD).
ABBREVIATIONS
- ART
- Anti-retroviral therapy
- RD
- Risk difference
- RR
- Risk Ratio
- LMIC
- Low- and Middle-Income Country
- PLHIV
- People living with HIV
- WHO
- World Health Organization
