ABSTRACT
Background Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) displays considerable clinical, genetic and molecular heterogeneity. Machine learning approaches have shown potential to disentangle complex disease landscapes and they have been utilised for patient stratification in ALS. However, lack of independent validation in different populations and in pre-mortem tissue samples have greatly limited their use in clinical and research settings. We overcame such issues by performing a large-scale study of over 600 post-mortem brain and blood samples of people with ALS from four independent datasets from the UK, Italy, the Netherlands and the US.
Methods Hierarchical clustering was performed on the 5000 most variably expressed autosomal genes identified from post-mortem motor cortex expression data of people with sporadic ALS from the KCL BrainBank (N=112). The molecular architectures of each cluster were investigated with gene enrichment, network and cell composition analysis. Methylation and genetic data were also used to assess if other omics measures differed between individuals. Validation of these clusters was achieved by applying linear discriminant analysis models based on the KCL BrainBank to the TargetALS US motor cortex (N=93), as well as Italian (N=15) and Dutch (N=397) blood expression datasets. Phenotype analysis was also performed to assess cluster-specific differences in clinical outcomes.
Results We identified three molecular phenotypes, which reflect the proposed major mechanisms of ALS pathogenesis: synaptic and neuropeptide signalling, excitotoxicity and oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. Known ALS risk genes were identified among the informative genes of each cluster, suggesting potential for genetic profiling of the molecular phenotypes. Cell types which are known to be associated with specific molecular phenotypes were found in higher proportions in those clusters. These molecular phenotypes were validated in independent motor cortex and blood datasets. Phenotype analysis identified distinct cluster-related outcomes associated with progression, survival and age of death. We developed a public webserver (https://alsgeclustering.er.kcl.ac.uk) that allows users to stratify samples with our model by uploading their expression data.
Conclusions We have identified three molecular phenotypes, driven by different cell types, which reflect the proposed major mechanisms of ALS pathogenesis. Our results support the hypothesis of biological heterogeneity in ALS where different mechanisms underly ALS pathogenesis in a subgroup of patients that can be identified by a specific expression signature. These molecular phenotypes show potential for stratification of clinical trials, the development of biomarkers and personalised treatment approaches.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
H.M is supported by GlaxoSmithKline and the KCL funded centre for Doctoral Training (CDT) in Data-Driven Health. R.K receives funding from MND Scotland. G.P.H is supported by the Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science and the KCL funded centre for Doctoral Training (CDT) in Data-Driven Health. A.A.K is funded by ALS Association Milton Safenowitz Research Fellowship (grant number22-PDF-609.DOI :10.52546/pc.gr.150909.), The Motor Neurone Disease Association (MNDA) Fellowship (Al Khleifat/Oct21/975-799), The Darby Rimmer Foundation, and The NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre. J.Q is funded by The Darby Rimmer Foundation and the Motor Neurone Disease Association. S.K and A.L.P are funded by MSWA and the Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science. P.S is an employee and shareholder of GlaxoSmithKline plc. A.I is funded by the Motor Neurone Disease Association and The NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre. A.A-C is an NIHR Senior Investigator (NIHR202421) and has received support from an EU Joint Programme - Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND) project. The work is supported through the following funding organisations under the aegis of JPND - www.jpnd.eu (United Kingdom, Medical Research Council (MR/L501529/1; MR/R024804/1) and Economic and Social Research Council (ES/L008238/1)) and through the Motor Neurone Disease Association, My Name'5 Doddie Foundation, and Alan Davidson Foundation. The London Neurodegenerative Diseases Brain Bank at KCL has received funding from the MRC and through the Brains for Dementia Research project (jointly funded by Alzheimer's Society and Alzheimer's Research UK. We would like to acknowledge the Target ALS Human Postmortem Tissue Core, New York Genome Centre for Genomics of Neurodegenerative Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association and TOW Foundation for the RNA-sequencing data used in this publication. This study represents independent research part funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The authors acknowledge use of the King's Computational Research, Engineering and Technology Environment (CREATE) https://doi.org/10.18742/rnvf-m076. This work was supported by resources provided by the Pawsey Supercomputing Research Centre with funding from the Australian Government and the Government of Western Australia. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
