ABSTRACT
Purpose PAM50 profiling assigns each breast cancer to a single intrinsic subtype based on a bulk tissue sample. However, individual cancers may show evidence of admixture with an alternate subtype that could affect prognosis and treatment response. We developed a method to model subtype admixture using semi-supervised non-negative matrix factorization (ssNMF) of whole transcriptome data and associated it with tumor, molecular, and survival characteristics for Luminal A (LumA) samples.
Methods We combined TCGA and METABRIC cohorts and obtained transcriptome, molecular, and clinical data, which yielded 11,379 gene transcripts in common, and 1,179 cases assigned to LumA. We used ssNMF to compute the subtype admixture proportions of the four major subtypes – pLumA, pLumB, pHER2 and pBasal – for each case and measured associations with tumor characteristics, molecular features, and survival.
Results Luminal A cases with low pLumA transcriptomic proportion were likelier to have non-luminal pathology, higher clinical and genomic risk factors, and lower overall survival (log rank P < 10−5), independent of age, stage, and tumor size. We found positive associations between pHER2 and HER2-positivity by IHC or FISH; between pLumB and PR negativity; and between pBasal and younger age, node positivity, TP53 mutation, and EGFR expression. Predominant basal admixture, in contrast to predominant LumB or HER2 admixture, was not associated with shorter survival.
Conclusions Bulk sampling for genomic analyses provides an opportunity to expose intratumor heterogeneity, as reflected by subtype admixture. Our results elucidate the striking extent of diversity among LumA cancers and suggest that determining the extent and type of admixture holds promise for refining individualized therapy. LumA cancers with a high degree of basal admixture appear to have distinct biological characterstics that warrant further study.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was partly supported by funding from the Breast Cancer Alliance.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
TCGA, METABRIC
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used is publicly available from the original sources.
