ABSTRACT
Objectives To investigate whether a higher proportion of night shifts is associated with a higher occurrence of musculoskeletal pain and headaches. Furthermore, to investigate whether sleep duration can mediate this potential association.
Method The study included 684 nurses in rotating shift work (day, evening, night) who responded to a daily questionnaire about working hours, sleep, and pain for 28 consecutive days. The data were treated as cross-sectional data.
Results A negative binomial regression analysis adjusted for age and BMI revealed that working a higher proportion of night shifts is not associated with a higher occurrence of musculoskeletal pain and headaches. On the contrary, those working ≥ 50 % night shifts had a significantly lower occurrence of pain in the lower extremities than those who worked <25 % night shifts (IRR 0.69 95 % CI 0.51, 0.94). There was no indication of a mediation effect with total sleep time (TST).
Conclusion The results of this study indicate that working a higher monthly proportion of night shifts is not associated with a higher occurrence of musculoskeletal pain and headaches.
What is already known on this topic?A few studies have investigated the association between proportion of night shifts and musculoskeletal pain and headaches, but the findings are conflicting, and the studies are largely based on retrospective questionnaires.
What this study adds This study gives further knowledge about the association between proportion of night shifts and musculoskeletal pain and headaches.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy The results have implications for the design of future studies on the effect of shift work on musculoskeletal pain and headache. The negative effect of night shifts are not necessarily dose-dependent, and real-life studies must seek to account for the “healthy worker effect”.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Institute of Occupational Health, Norway
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics (approval number 2012/199/REK sor-ost B).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
