Abstract
Background Cancer death rates are declining, in part due to smoking cessation, better detection and new treatments; nevertheless, a large fraction of metastatic cancer patients die soon after diagnosis. Few studies and interventions focus on these patients. Our study aims characterize early mortality in a wide range of metastatic solid tumors.
Methods We retrieved data on adult patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed de-novo metastatic solid tumors between the years 2004-2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER). Our primary outcome was cancer specific early death rate (defined as death within two months of diagnosis). Additional data extracted included socio-demographical data, tumor primary, sites of metastases, and cause of death.
Results 109,207 (20.8%) died of cancer within two months of diagnosis. The highest rates of early death were found in hepatic (36%), pancreato-biliary (31%) and lung (25%) primaries. Factors associated with early death included primary site, liver and brain metastases, increasing age and lower income. Cancer was the cause of death in 92.1% of all early deaths. Two-month mortality rates have improved during the study period (from 22.4% in 2004 to 18.8% in 2016).
Conclusion A fifth of metastatic cancer patients die soon after diagnosis, with little improvement over the last decade. Further research is required to better classify and identify patients at risk for early mortality, which patients might benefit from faster diagnostic tracks, and which might avoid invasive and futile diagnostic procedures.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr Urban reports receiving consulting fees from Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Roche Israel, Takeda, Nucleai, Rhenium Oncotest, and lecture fees from Astrazeneca, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Roche, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Seronoe. Dr Globus reports receiving lecture fees from Pfizer Lilly, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Gilead, and Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, consulting fees from Lilly, Gilead and Novartis, and expenses for conferences from Pfizer, Medison, Rhenium Onctotest, and Gilead. Dr Sagie, Levina, and Brachana report no potential conflicting interests.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Given the nature of this study, there was no requirement for institutional review board submission. Access to the SEER data was in accordance with the SEER data agreement.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files
