Summary
The modern response to pandemics, critical for effective public health measures, is shaped by the availability and integration of diverse epidemiological outbreak data. Genomic surveillance has come to the forefront during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at both local and global scales to identify variants of concern. Tracking variants of concern (VOC) is integral to understanding the evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in space and time. Combining phylogenetics with epidemiological data like case incidence, spatial spread, and transmission dynamics generates actionable information. Here we discuss the genome surveillance done in Pune, India, through sequencing 10,496 samples from infected individuals and integrating them with multiple heterogeneous outbreak data. The rise and fall of VOCs along with shifting transmission dynamics in the time interval of December 2020 to March 2022 was identified. Population-based estimates of the proportion of circulating variants indicated the second and third peak of infection in Pune to be driven by VOCs Kappa (B.1.617.1), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529) respectively. Integrating single nucleotide polymorphism changes across all sequenced genomes identified C (Cytosine) > T (Thymine) and G (Guanine) > T (Thymine) substitutions to dominate with higher rates of adaptive evolution in Spike (S), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), and Nucleocapsid (N) genes. Spike Protein mutational profiling during and pre-Omicron VOCs indicated differential rank ordering of high-frequency mutations in specific domains that increased the charge and binding properties of the protein. Time-resolved phylogenetic analysis of Omicron sub-lineages identified specific recombinant X lineages, XZ, XQ, and XM. BA.1 from Pune was found to be highly divergent by global sequence alignment and hierarchical clustering. Our “band of five” outbreak data analytics that includes the integration of five heterogeneous data types indicates that a strong surveillance system with comprehensive high-quality metadata was critical to understand the spatiotemporal evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 genome in Pune. We anticipate the use of such integrated workflows to be critical for pandemic preparedness in the future.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported in part by the Rockefeller Foundation, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Villoo Poonawalla Foundation (VPF), Janakidevi Bajaj Gram Vikas Sanstha (JBGVS), Science and Engineering Board (SERB) Start-up Research Grant SRG/2020/000062, Department of Biotechnology (DBT)), RAD-22017/28/2020-KGD-DBT, INSACOG, and Johns Hopkins India Institute Covid Relief Fund
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The individual ethics committee of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Chemical Laboratory of Pune and Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research of Pune gave ethical approval for this genome sequencing study
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The section containing the list of authors and their affiliations has been updated. Page numbers have been added. The materials and method section has been placed after the conclusion section.
Data Availability
All data used in this study are available online at GISAID Database
