Abstract
The disconnection hypothesis of schizophrenia proposes that symptoms of the disorder arise as a result of aberrant functional integration between segregated areas of the brain. The concept of metastability characterizes the coexistence of competing tendencies for functional integration and functional segregation in the brain and is therefore well suited for the study of schizophrenia. In this study we investigate metastability as a neuromechanistic biomarker of schizophrenia pathology, including a demonstration of reliability and face validity.
Group-level discrimination, individual-level classification, and pathophysiological relevance were assessed using two independent case-control studies of schizophrenia, the Human Connectome Project Early Psychosis (HCPEP) study (controls n=82, non-affective psychosis n=53) and the Cobre study (controls n=71, cases n=59). In this work we introduce a new framework that uses Leading Eigenvector Dynamic Analysis (LEiDA) to capture specific features of dynamic functional connectivity and then implements a novel approach to estimate metastability. We used non-parametric testing to evaluate group-level differences and a naïve Bayes classifier to discriminate cases from controls.
Our results show that our new approach is capable of discriminating cases from controls with elevated effect sizes relative to published literature, reflected in an up to 76% area under the curve (AUC) in out-of-sample classification analyses. Furthermore, our analyses demonstrated that patients with early psychosis exhibit intermittent disconnectivity of subcortical regions with frontal cortex and cerebellar regions, introducing new insights about the mechanistic bases of these conditions.
Overall, these findings demonstrate reliability and face validity of metastability as a neuromechanistic biomarker of schizophrenia pathology.
Competing Interest Statement
RM has received honoraria for educational talks from Otsuka and Janssen
Funding Statement
RB is funded by a Wellcome Trust Career Development Fellowship JC is funded by Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology OD and FET are funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
HCPEP - Procedures were approved by the Partners Healthcare Human Research Committee/IRB and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants provided written informed consent, or in the case of minors, parental written consent and participant assent. Cobre - The study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of the University of New Mexico (UNM) and all subjects provided written informed consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data were obtained from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA; study DOI: 10.15154/1524263). NDA is a collaborative informatics system created by the National Institutes of Health to provide a national resource to support and accelerate research in mental health. The Cobre data were downloaded from the Collaborative Informatics and Neuroimaging Suite Data Exchange tool (COINS; http://coins.mrn.org/dx), and data collection was performed at the Mind Research Network and funded by a Center of Biomedical Research Excellence Grant No. 5P20RR021938/P20GM103472 from the National Institutes of Health to Dr. Vince Calhoun.
