ABSTRACT
Intensive care unit (ICU) staff continue to face recurrent work-related traumatic events throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Intrusive memories (IMs) of such traumatic events comprise sensory image-based memories. Harnessing research on preventing IMs with a novel behavioural intervention on the day of trauma, here we take critical next steps in developing this approach as a treatment for ICU staff who are already experiencing IMs days, weeks, or months post-trauma. To address the urgent need to develop novel mental health interventions, we used Bayesian statistical approaches to optimise a brief imagery-competing task intervention to reduce the number of IMs. We evaluated a digitised version of the intervention for remote, scalable delivery. We conducted a two-arm, parallel-group, randomised, adaptive Bayesian optimisation trial. Eligible participants worked clinically in a UK NHS ICU during the pandemic, experienced at least one work-related traumatic event, and at least three IMs in the week prior to recruitment. Participants were randomised to receive immediate or delayed (after four weeks) access to the intervention.
Primary outcome was the number of IMs of trauma during week 4, controlling for baseline week. Analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis as a between-group comparison. Prior to final analysis, sequential Bayesian analyses were conducted (n=20,23,29,37,41,45) to inform early stopping of the trial prior to the planned maximum recruitment (n=150). Final analysis (n=75) showed strong evidence for a positive treatment effect (Bayes factor, BF=1.25 × 106): the immediate arm reported fewer IMs (median=1, IQR=0-3) than the delayed arm (median=10, IQR=6-16.5). With further digital enhancements, the intervention (n=28) also showed a positive treatment effect (BF=7.31). Sequential Bayesian analyses provided evidence for reducing IMs of work-related trauma for healthcare workers. This methodology also allowed us to rule out negative effects early, reduced the planned maximum sample size, and allowed evaluation of enhancements. Trial Registration NCT02044809 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Competing Interest Statement
The study was funded by the Wellcome Trust (223016/Z/21/Z). JK is shareholder and director of P1vital Products Ltd which is the study sponsor and manufacturer of i-spero® . VR and LI are employed by P1vital Products Ltd. MBB is an adjunct member of the DMC. CS salary is part funded by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and Medical Research Council (MRC). EAH is on the Board of Trustees of the MQ Foundation. EAH also receives funding from the Swedish Research Council, RannÍs The Icelandic Research Fund, OAK foundation, The Lupina Foundation and AFA Försäkring. EAH developed the intervention approach and training in using it (Anenome™). EAH receives book royalties from Guildford Press and Oxford University Press, and receives occasional honoraria for conference keynotes and clinical workshops. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Clinical Trial
NCT04992390
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
This research was funded in whole or in part by the Wellcome Trust (223016/Z/21/Z).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Wales Research Ethics Committee (Wales REC 6, 21/WA/0173) of the NHS Health Research Authority gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Anonymised databases with the individual participant data and the metadata for Bayesian analyses, along with a data dictionary and analytical code have been uploaded to the Open Science Framework (OSF) and will be made available following publication for anyone who wishes to access the data for any purpose. The Study Protocol and Bayesian Statistical Analysis Plan are available on the OSF platform (osf.io/2xn5m). All data and supporting information mentioned above will be shared indefinitely and with no end date on the OSF Platform.
