Summary
Background There is uncertainty and contention around whether former participants in sports characterised by repetitive head impact subsequently experience an elevated risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, and if the occurrence of these neurodegenerative disorders differs between amateur and professional athletes who have different levels of exposure. In a meta-analysis, we aggregated new results from individual-participant analyses of a cohort study of former amateur athletes with those from a systematic review of existing studies.
Methods The cohort study comprised 2005 male retired amateur athletes who had competed internationally for Finland (1920-1965), and a general population comparison group of 1386 age-equivalent men. Dementia occurrence was ascertained from linked health registries. For the PROSPERO-registered (CRD42022352780) systematic review, we searched PubMed and Embase from their inception to August 23 2022, including cohort studies published in English that reported standard estimates of association and variance. Study-specific estimates were aggregated using random-effect meta-analysis. An adapted Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess study quality.
Findings In the cohort study, up to 46 years of health surveillance of 3391 men gave rise to 406 dementia cases (265 Alzheimer’s disease). After adjustment for confounding factors, former boxers experienced elevated rates of dementia (hazard ratio 3.60 [95% CI 2.46, 5.28]) and Alzheimer’s disease (4.10 [2.55, 6.61]) relative to general population controls. Associations were of somewhat lower magnitude in retired wrestlers (dementia: 1.51 [0.98, 2.34]; Alzheimer’s disease: 2.11 [1.28, 3.48]) and soccer players (dementia: 1.55 [1.00, 2.41]; Alzheimer’s disease: 2.07 [1.23, 3.46]), with some estimates including unity. The systematic review identified 827 potentially eligible published articles, of which 7 met inclusion criteria. All studies sampled men and the majority were of moderate quality. After aggregating results from these retrieved studies with those from the new cohort study, results for all contact sports combined revealed a raised risk of dementia (summary risk ratio 1.91 [95% CI 1.30, 2.82], I2=87%) and Alzheimer’s disease (2.30 [1.32, 4.00], I2=83%) relative to the general population. Former boxers had higher rates of dementia (2 studies: summary risk ratio 3.14 [95% CI 1.72, 5.74], I2=34%) and Alzheimer’s disease (2 studies: 3.07 [1.01, 9.38], I2=55%), as did retired soccer players (3 studies of dementia: 2.78 [1.69, 4.59], I2=86%; 2 studies of Alzheimer’s disease: 3.22 [1.34, 7.75], I2=81%). While the pooled estimate for dementia in retired American football players was less convincing (4 studies: 1.63 [0.76, 3.49], I2 =75%), disease occurrence in onetime professionals was markedly higher (2.96 [1.66, 5.30]) than amateurs where there was no suggestion of an association (0.90 [0.52, 1.56]). There was also a risk differential for retired professional (3.61 [2.92, 4.45]) and amateur (1.60 [1.11, 2.30]) soccer players.
Interpretation Based on a modest collection of studies exclusively comprising men, former participants in contact sports subsequently experienced poorer brain health, and there was a suggestion that retired professionals had the greatest risk. Whether these findings are generalisable to the contact sports not featured, and to women, warrants examination.
Funding This work was unfunded.
Evidence before this study The observation that brain injury traumatic enough to warrant hospitalisation is associated with the development of dementia raises the possibility that former participants in sports characterised by low intensity repetitive head impact may also experience an increased burden of the disease, and that dementia rates might differ between former amateur and professional athletes who have different levels of exposure to training and competition. Searching PubMed and Embase using terms for specific contact sports (e.g., ‘boxing’, ‘martial’, ‘wrestling’, ‘football’, ‘soccer’, ‘hockey’, ‘rugby’) and neurodegenerative outcomes (e.g., ‘dementia’, ‘Alzheimer’) revealed studies of dementia risk in retired athletes from American football, soccer, and boxing but no evidence for wrestling or other contact sports. There was a suggestion of mixed results across studies. While we also retrieved several relevant systematic reviews, these were all narrative reports and there was no meta-analysis offering a quantitative synthesis of the available evidence, including analysis by professional/amateur status.
Added value of this study In the first individual cohort study to simultaneously examine effects across multiple contact sports, after adjustment for confounding factors, relative to the general population, there was a markedly raised risk of dementia in former boxers which was weaker but still elevated for soccer players and wrestlers. The strength of these associations was more pronounced for Alzheimer’s disease whereby there was a quadrupling of risk in retired boxers and a doubling in onetime wrestlers and soccer players. After incorporating these new results into the first meta-analysis in this field, in aggregate, there was a greater risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in all former contact sports participants combined, and in retired soccer players and boxers, relative to the general population. While former American football players did not collectively have clearly elevated rates of dementia, there was evidence that those from professional backgrounds experienced a raised risk which was not apparent in retired amateurs. This professional– amateur risk differential was also seen in erstwhile soccer players.
Implications of all the available evidence With soccer being the most common participation sport worldwide, and wrestling and American football long-established in the educational systems of selected countries, quantifying the burden of dementia for these activities has potential for public health impact, particularly if the risk is also raised in the more populous amateur groups. The existing evidence base is, however, hampered by an absence of studies of women, and is modest in scale and narrow in scope, currently not including several popular contact sports such as rugby or basketball.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No direct funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Data collection was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital Districts of Helsinki and Uusimaa, and all participants provided informed consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None to declare.
Data sharing: Interested parties should contact UMK and SJS regarding access to the Finnish cohort study data.
(E. david.batty{at}ucl.ac.uk)
(philipp.frank.16{at}ucl.ac.uk)
(urho.m.kujala{at}fimnet.fi)
(seppo.sarna{at}helsinki.fi)
(c.valencia-hernandez{at}imperial.ac.uk)
(jaakko.kaprio{at}helsinki.fi)
We have included a systematic review and meta-analysis alongside the new cohort study results.
Data Availability
Bona fide researchers should contact the authors to discuss the availability of raw data.
