Abstract
Objective To investigate the disparity and predictors of death registration in India.
Methods We used National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2019-21) data. Based on eligible household members’ reports, we estimated death registration coverage among 84,390 deaths in all age groups across the country. We did multilevel binary logistic regression to examine demographic and socio-demographic predictor variables of death registration at state, district, and individual levels. We used GIS software for spatial mapping of the level of death registration at the district level, disaggregated by sex.
Findings The death registration at the national level is 71%. We found that out of 707 districts in 2019, 122 and 53 districts recorded death registration level below 40 percent among females and males, respectively. There was a considerable difference in the death registration level by sex (male-74% and female-66%). Death registration level was higher in urban areas compared to rural areas (83% vs. 66%). We found death registration level was higher among households with BPL cards (72%), bank accounts (71%) and covered with health insurance (77%). Females, rural populations, people from disadvantaged castes, poorest wealth quintile, Muslims, and not having BPL cards have a lower likelihood of death registration in India. District-level predictors were not statistically significant in the model.
Conclusion Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the deceased are significantly associated with their death registration. We suggest periodic awareness programs on death registration procedures and facilitating easy access to death registration offices in lower performing districts and areas among the marginalised population groups.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are publically available on the DHS website
