Abstract
I study households’ primary health care usage in India, which presents a paradox. I examine why most households use fee-charging private health care services even though (1) most providers have no formal medical qualifications and (2) in markets where qualified doctors offer free care through public hospitals. I present evidence that this puzzling practice has deep historical routes. I examine India’s coercive forced sterilization policy implemented between 1976 and 1977. Utilizing the unexpected timing of the policy, multiple measures of forced sterilization, including at a granular level, and an instrumental variable approach, I document that places heavily affected by the policy have lower public health care usage today. I also show that the instrument I use is unrelated to a battery of demographic, economic, or political aspects before the forced sterilization period. Finally, I explore the mechanism and document that supply-side factors do not explain these differences. Instead, I demonstrate that places with greater exposure to forced sterilization have higher confidence in private hospitals and doctors to provide good treatment.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This study is not a clinical trial.
Funding Statement
I acknowledge no financial support for this project.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
I use publicly available data for which no IRB is required.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
* I thank Abhijit Banerjee for teaching MITx course (MicroMasters Program in Data, Economics, and Development Policy) and clearly explaining the puzzles associated with primary health care usage in India, which become the primary motivation for this research. I also thank numerous seminar and conference participants for their excellent feedback. All remaining errors are my own. I am grateful for financial support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 21K13307). This paper is revised extensively and supersedes an earlier (and incomplete) version circulated under the title “Understanding the Puzzle of Primary Health Care Use: Evidence from India”
This paper is revised extensively and supersedes an earlier (and incomplete) version circulated under the title "Understanding the Puzzle of Primary Health Care Use: Evidence from India".
Data Availability
All the datasets are publicly available and are duly cited in the manuscript.
