Abstract
Background Pubertal timing is linked to the emergence and severity of psychopathology during adolescence. However, variability in methods used to calculate pubertal timing may contribute to inconsistencies in the literature. The aim of this study was to develop a new measure of pubertal timing and investigate its association with psychopathology.
Methods We analyzed data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) cohort, a longitudinal study of ∼11,000 children. We implemented three different models of pubertal timing by predicting chronological age from i) observed physical development, ii) hormonal assays, and iii) a combination of physical development and hormones, using a supervised machine learning method. Our method of quantifying pubertal timing was calculated as the difference between predicted and actual age in each model. The performance of the new physical pubertal timing model was also compared to a measure of pubertal timing commonly used in the literature. We compared the three new measures by evaluating their associations with psychopathology.
Results The combined model provided the best prediction of age. The physical pubertal timing model had better performance compared to the commonly used existing model. Pubertal timing estimates from both physical and combined models were significantly associated with most dimensions of psychopathology in males and females (early timing associated with higher symptoms). The physical model accounted for more variance in psychopathology than the combined and hormonal models.
Conclusions This study proposed new models of pubertal timing that utilize multiple pubertal features and account for nonlinear associations with age. Findings suggest that timing of physical maturation may play a predominant role in predicting psychopathology in early adolescence. Further investigation is needed to see if measures of timing that incorporate hormones are more predictive of psychopathology across different stages of late childhood and adolescence.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Niousha Dehestani was supported by a Deakin University Postgraduate Research Scholarships (DUPRS). Additionally, this study was supported by the MASSIVE high-performance computing facility (www.massive.org.au).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study used openly available datasets from Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (https://abcdstudy.org/)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This study used data from Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). This is a longitudinal study which collected data from ∼ 11000 children in age 9-10 and follow them through 10 years. A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners.html. A listing of participating sites and a complete listing of the study investigators can be found at https://abcdstudy.org/scientists/workgroups/. ABCD consortium investigators designed and implemented the study and/or provided data but did not participate in the analysis or writing of this report. This manuscript reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of the NIH or ABCD consortium investigators.