ABSTRACT
The role cardiac function plays in the predilection for, and progression of, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), is complex and unclear. While a number of low-frequency genetic variants of large effect-size have been shown to underlie both cardiovascular disease and dementia, recent studies have highlighted the importance of common genetic variants of small-effect size, which, in aggregate, are embodied by a polygenic risk score (PRS). In this study we aim to investigate the effect of polygenic risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) on brain atrophy in AD using whole brain volume (WBV) and put our findings in context with the polygenic risk for AD and presumed small vessel disease as quantified by white matter hyperintensities (WMH). We used 730 subjects from the ADNI database to investigate PRS effects (beyond APOE) on whole brain volumes, total and regional WMH and amyloid beta across diagnostic groups. In a subset of these subjects (N=602) we utilise longitudinal changes in whole brain volume over a maximum of 24 months using the boundary shift integral approach. Linear regression and linear mixed effects models were used to investigate the effect of WMH at baseline as well as AD-PRS and CAD-PRS on whole brain atrophy and whole brain atrophy acceleration, respectively. All genetic associations were examined under oligogenic (p=1e-5) and the more variant-inclusive polygenic (p=0.5) scenarios. Our results suggest no evidence for a link between PRS score and markers of AD pathology at baseline (when stratified by diagnostic group). However, both AD-PRS and CAD-PRS were associated with longitudinal decline in WBV (AD PRS t=3.3, PFDR=0.007 over 24 months in healthy controls) and surprisingly, under certain conditions WBV atrophy is statistically more correlated with cardiac PRS than AD PRS (CAD PRS t=2.1, PFDR=0.04 over 24 months in the MCI group). Further, in our regional analysis of WMH, AD PRS beyond APOE is predictive of white matter volume in the occipital lobe in AD subjects in the polygenic regime. Finally, the rate of change of brain volume (or atrophy acceleration) may be sensitive to AD polygenic risk beyond APOE in healthy individuals (t=2, p=0.04). For subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), beyond APOE, a more inclusive polygenic risk score including more variants, shows CAD PRS to be more predictive of WBV atrophy, than an oligogenic approach including fewer larger effect size variants.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
E.deS. acknowledges support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (UCLH BRC). A.A. holds a Medical Research Council eMedLab Medical Bioinformatics Career Development Fellowship. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council [grant number MR/L016311/1]. C.H.S. is supported by an Alzheimers Society Junior Fellowship (AS-JF-17-011). J.B. was supported by an Alzheimers Research United Kingdom Senior Research Fellowship. M.A.S. acknowledges financial support the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)-funded UCL Centre for Doctoral Training in Medical Imaging (EP/L016478/1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
