ABSTRACT
Importance Tick-borne diseases (TBD) including Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiosis (SFGR), ehrlichiosis, and increasingly Lyme disease represent a substantial public health concern throughout much of the Southeastern United States. Yet, there is uncertainty about the epidemiology of these diseases due to pitfalls in existing diagnostic test methodologies.
Objective To examine patterns of diagnostic testing and incidence of TBD in a large, academic healthcare system.
Design Cross-sectional study of diagnostic test results from UNC Health for the period January 1st, 2017 to November 30th, 2020.
Setting Large, academic healthcare system in central North Carolina including inpatient and outpatient facilities.
Participants All Individuals seeking routine care at UNC Health facilities who had testing for SFGR, ehrlichiosis or Lyme disease performed during the study period
Measurements Rates of test positivity, testing completeness, and incidence of TBD
Results Among the 20,528 diagnostic tests performed, we identified 47 laboratory-confirmed, incident cases of SFGR, 27 of ehrlichiosis, and 76 of Lyme, representing incidence rates of 4.7%, 7.1%, and 0.7% respectively. However, 79.3% of SFGR tests and 74.3% Ehrlichia tests lacked a paired convalescent sample. The total number of tests for Lyme disease was more than SFGR and ehrlichiosis combined, despite the relatively low incidence of disease in region. Most striking, testing for ehrlichiosis was performed in only half of patients in whom SFGR was ordered, suggesting that this disease remains underrecognized. Overall, we estimate that there were 187 incident cases of SFGR and 309 of ehrlichiosis that were not identified due to incomplete testing; a number that would drastically increase – and in the case of ehrlichiosis, nearly double – the total number of cases reported.
Conclusions and Relevance A majority of patients suspected of having TBD did not have testing performed in accordance with established guidelines, substantially limiting our understanding of TBD epidemiology. Furthermore, there appears to be a large discrepancy between the local burden of disease and the testing that is performed. These findings underscore the need to pursue more robust, active surveillance strategies to estimate the burden of TBDs and distribution of causative pathogens.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for the study was provided by a Creativity Hub Award to RMB from the UNC Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research. RMB is also supported by a Caregivers at Carolina Award made by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (Award 2015213). Research was supported by the North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (NC TraCS) Institute, which is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UL1TR002489.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (IRB 20-3502). As a limited data set under CFR 45, Part 164.514 (e), written informed consent or waiver of HIPAA authorization was not required.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
