Abstract
We investigate the determinants of several measures of psychological distress and work and social adjustment, using data from a large survey covering six countries and three continents over the COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis reveals substantial cross-country heterogeneity and identifies a strong effect of COVID-19 specific measures of distress onto generic ones, but not the other way around. The results confirm the importance of controlling for individual characteristics, which help explain some of the cross-country differences. Finally, they also highlight specific categories of individuals who have recorded extremely high levels of psychological distress.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the PRIN project "Econometric Methods and Models for the analysis of Big Data: improving forecasting ability by understanding and modelling complexity", code: 201742PW2W_001.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by Ethics Committee of Kingston University, London, United Kingdom. Participants were required to provide electronic consent and were under no obligation to complete the study. Upon completion of the questionnaires, participants were debriefed.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
* Acknowledgements: Distaso acknowledges financial support from the PRIN project “Econometric Methods and Models for the analysis of Big Data: improving forecasting ability by understanding and modelling complexity”, code: 201742PW2W_001.
Email: w.distaso{at}imperial.ac.uk.
Data Availability
The survey (upon which the database has been created) has been carried out by Qualtrics and we have signed a contract whereby we cannot share the data.