ABSTRACT
Objective The LIVE-AIR trial demonstrated that the anti-GM-CSF monoclonal antibody, lenzilumab improved the likelihood of survival without invasive mechanical ventilation (SWOV) in COVID-19 patients; with greatest effect in those with baseline CRP below the median baseline value of 79 mg/L. Similar to GM-CSF, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are correlated with COVID-19 severity. This current analysis assessed the utility of baseline CRP levels to guide treatment with lenzilumab.
Design LIVE-AIR was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized 1:1 and stratified according to age and disease severity, to receive lenzilumab or placebo on Day 0, were followed through Day 28.
Setting Secondary and tertiary care hospitals in the US and Brazil.
Participants 520 hospitalized COVID-19 participants with SpO2≤ 94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen but not invasive mechanical ventilation were included.
Interventions Lenzilumab (1800mg; divided as 3 doses, q8h) or placebo infusion alongside standard treatments including corticosteroids and remdesivir.
Main outcome measures A multi-variate logistic regression analysis assessed key baseline risk factors for progression to IMV or death. The primary endpoint, SWOV, and key secondary endpoints were analyzed according to baseline CRP levels in all participants with CRP values.
Results The multi-variate analysis demonstrated that elevated baseline plasma CRP was the most predictive feature for progression to IMV or death. SWOV was achieved in 152 (90%; 95%CI: 85to 94) lenzilumab and 183 (79%; 72 to 84) placebo participants with baseline CRP<150 mg/L and its likelihood was greater with lenzilumab than placebo (HR: 2.54; 95%CI, 1.46 to 4.41; p=0.0009) but not in participants with CRP≥150 mg/L at baseline. CRP as a covariate in the overall analysis demonstrated a statistically significant interaction with lenzilumab treatment (p=0.044). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events in participants with baseline CRP<150 mg/L were reported in 18% and 28% in lenzilumab or placebo, respectively. No treatment-emergent serious adverse events were attributable to lenzilumab.
Conclusion These finding suggest that COVID-19 participants with low baseline CRP levels achieve the greatest clinical benefit from lenzilumab and that baseline CRP levels may be a useful biomarker to guide therapeutic intervention.
Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04351152
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC GM-CSF is one of the early upstream mediators and orchestrators of the hyperinflammatory immune response following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Baseline levels of GM-CSF and CRP have each been shown to correlate with COVID-19 disease progression. Increases in CRP are driven by elevations of IL-6 during the hyperinflammatory response following SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled LIVE-AIR study, GM-CSF neutralization with lenzilumab significantly improved the likelihood of survival without invasive mechanical ventilation (SWOV, primary endpoint, also referred to as ventilator-free survival) vs. placebo (HR:1.54; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.32; p=0.0403), which included standard supportive care including corticosteroids and remdesivir. No treatment-emergent serious adverse events attributable to lenzilumab have been reported to date.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS A comprehensive analysis of LIVE -AIR CRP data provides evidence for the utility of baseline CRP to predict progression to IMV and death. Baseline CRP was identified to be the strongest predictor of SWOV in this study. Patients with baseline CRP<150 mg/L represented 78% of the study population and demonstrated the greatest clinical benefit with lenzilumab, including SWOV through day 28 (HR: 2.54; 95%CI; 1.46-4.41; nominal p=0.0009). A biomarker-driven approach using baseline CRP levels to guide therapeutic intervention may improve outcomes in those hospitalized with COVID-19. Participants with baseline CRP levels above 150 mg/L were described as experiencing COVID-19-associated hyperinflammation and were at risk of imminent escalation of respiratory support or death. Elevated baseline plasma CRP was the most predictive feature for progression to IMV or death (OR, 0.15; 95%CI, 0.07-0.29; nominal p<0.001). These findings suggest that baseline CRP may be a useful biomarker in determining which participants may be most successfully treated with lenzilumab.
Competing Interest Statement
ZT has received research support from Humanigen, Inc, unrestricted education support from Gilead, ViiV, and Merck (all to the institution). CFK has received research support grants (to the institution) from NIH, CDC, Gilead Sciences and ViiV; VCM has received investigator-initiated research grants (to the institution) and consultation fees (both unrelated to the current work) from Eli Lilly, Bayer, Gilead Sciences and ViiV; AK, CD, DC, OA, GC are employees of, or consultants to, Humanigen, Inc. VMC and FC are third-party agency consultants to Humanigen; CP is a paid consultant to Gilead. ADB is supported by grants from NIAID (grants AI110173 and AI120698) Amfar (#109593) and Mayo Clinic (HH Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan Named Professorship of Infectious Diseases). ADB is a paid consultant for AbbVie and Flambeau Diagnostics, is a paid member of the DSMB for Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Equilium, and Excision Biotherapeutics, has received fees for speaking for Reach MD, owns equity for scientific advisory work in Zentalis and Nference, and is founder and President of Splissen Therapeutics.
Clinical Trial
NCT04351152
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Humanigen, Inc. Burlingame, CA
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice guidelines of the International Council for Harmonization E6 and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. In the U.S., central IRB (ADVARRA) approval was obtained in addition to local IRB approval at each participating institution, as appropriate. In Brazil, regulatory approval was granted from the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria, ANVISA) and approvals from the National Commission of Ethics and Research (Comissao Nacional de Etica em Pesquisa, CONEP) and the Institutional Ethics Committee (Comite de Etica em Pesquisas, CEP) were obtained. All aspects of this company sponsored phase 3 clinical trial (protocol HGEN003 06) were conducted in accordance with the National Health Council (Conselho Nacional de Saude, CNS), Ministry of Health and other applicable regulatory requirements in Brazil. Patients or their legally appointed representative signed written informed consent forms. An independent data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) examined the safety and efficacy of the study medication compared with placebo in addition to standard of care throughout the duration of the study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript