ABSTRACT
Background A direct antiglobulin test (DAT) checks for antibody or complement on the surface of RBCs and is often done following a transfusion reaction. While passive anti-A and anti-B antibodies are known to cause positive DATs, the extent this occurs following transfusion is unknown.
Study Design and methods DAT results, ABO type and blood product information was recorded on 1097 transfusion reactions at a large academic hospital over 8 years. The effect of patient blood type, product type and plasma compatibility of blood product transfused on DAT results were determined. Statistical significance was determined using Chi-squared testing.
Results Plasma compatibility of the product was a strong predictor of a positive DAT with plasma compatible transfusions having a 9.4% positive rate while plasma incompatible transfusions were positive 44% of the time (P<0.0001). Patient ABO blood type was a strong predictor of a positive DAT with Type O patients having 6.6% positive rate and non-O patients having a positive rate of 20.6% (P <0.0001). These results were significant for individual blood types as well. Type A, B or AB patients had higher DAT positive rates even when plasma incompatible transfusions were excluded from the analysis (P<0.0001). Platelets were significantly more likely to be associated with a positive DAT when compared to RBC transfusions.
Conclusions These results show plasma compatibility and ABO types are strong predictors of positive DAT results following a transfusion reaction. Anti-A and anti-B antibodies are estimated to account for about 50% of positive DATs in this study.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
HawkIRB IRB#202001338
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Source of support: Department of Pathology, University of Iowa
Data Availability
Deidentified data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors