Abstract
Introduction Studies show that vascular surgery patients have the desire to participate more actively in their treatment, but that they find it difficult to express themselves. Patients prefer to know all the therapeutic options available, not just those that the surgeon considers appropriate. With this knowledge, patients can begin to choose the most appropriate therapeutic modality for themselves, also becoming responsible for the therapeutic decision. Therefore, the objective of this paper was to analyze the refusal rate of elective aortic aneurysm surgery in asymptomatic patients after the presentation of a detailed IC form followed by a meeting where the patient and his or her family could analyze each item;
Methods Data from 49 patients who had aneurysms and were offered surgical treatment were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
Results After reading the IC and the described meeting, among the 49 patients, 13 (26.5%) refused surgery. We observed that patients who refused surgery had statistically smaller aneurysms than patients who accepted surgery (9% versus 26%).
Conclusion One-quarter of patients who were indicated for elective surgical correction of aortic aneurysms rejected surgery after SDM, which consisted of the presentation of an IC form followed by a clarification meeting for the patient and his or her family to analyze each item. The only factor that significantly influenced a rejection of the procedure was the size of the aneurysm, so patients who rejected surgery had smaller aneurysms than those who accepted surgery.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (CAAE: CAAE: 13181919.3.0000.0071). Ethical approval was given by the Institutional Review Boards and informed consent was obtained from the included patients.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
