Abstract
Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with significant acute clinical manifestations, and reports indicate that some patients experience prolonged symptomatology and morbidity. These late clinical manifestations have been termed Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) and hypothesised to be associated with clinical severity in the acute infection phase and biochemical abnormalities.
Aim Evaluate the incidence of PASC in previously hospitalised COVID-19 patients and compare the admission and follow-up levels of biochemical parameters stratified according to baseline clinical severity.
Methods N = 168 COVID-19 patients previously hospitalised at the Zan Mitrev Clinic in Skopje, North Macedonia, with matched laboratory data at baseline and follow-up clinical visit > 30 days post-discharge, were stratified according to National Institute of Health clinical severity guidelines as mild, moderate, severe or critical according to admission clinical presentation. We assessed the incidence of PASC and compared the biochemical profile.
Results The median hospitalisation and clinical follow-up period were 11 (9-20) and 53 (30-105) days. The overall incidence of PASC was 56.5% (95/168); most PASC cases were confined to the severe sub-group (61/101, 61.4%). Contrary to mild and moderate cases and a healthy “non-COVID-19” control cohort, we observed that severe COVID-19 cases experienced sustained biochemical disturbances, most notably elevated D-dimers and Ferritin of 600 ng/ml (283-1168) and 432 ng/ml (170-916), respectively.
Conclusions Previously hospitalised severe COVID-19 patients are more likely to experience Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 and prolonged biochemical disturbances, evident by abnormal values of D-dimers and Ferritin.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT04478539
Funding Statement
Authors received no external funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional review board approval was obtained from the local Ethical Committee of the Zan Mitrev Clinic per the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-Good Clinical Practice.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Mariija Simjanoska: m.simjanoska{at}columbia.edu, Zan Mitrev: zan{at}zmc.mk, Gianluca Villa: gianluca.villa{at}unifi.it, Daniel O Griffin: dg2810{at}cumc.columbia.edu, Rodney Rosalia: rodney.rosalia{at}zmc.mk
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this research study are available from the corresponding author, Rodney Rosalia, upon request.
