Abstract
Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is critical to reduce asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission, curb the spread of variants by travelers, and maximize treatment efficacy. Low-sensitivity nasal-swab testing (antigen and some nucleic-acid-amplification tests) is commonly used for surveillance and symptomatic testing, but the ability of low-sensitivity nasal-swab tests to detect the earliest stages of infection has not been established. In this case-ascertained study, initially-SARS-CoV-2-negative household contacts of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 prospectively self-collected paired anterior-nares nasal-swab and saliva samples twice daily for viral-load quantification by high-sensitivity RT-qPCR and digital-RT-PCR assays. We captured viral-load profiles from the incidence of infection for seven individuals and compared diagnostic sensitivities between respiratory sites. Among unvaccinated persons, high-sensitivity saliva testing detected infection up to 4.5 days before viral loads in nasal swabs reached the limit of detection of low-sensitivity nasal-swab tests. For most participants, nasal swabs reached higher peak viral loads than saliva, but were undetectable or at lower loads during the first few days of infection. High-sensitivity saliva testing was most reliable for earliest detection. Our study illustrates the value of acquiring early (within hours after a negative high-sensitivity test) viral-load profiles to guide the appropriate analytical sensitivity and respiratory site for detecting earliest infections. Such data are challenging to acquire but critical to design optimal testing strategies in the current pandemic and will be required for responding to future viral pandemics. As new variants and viruses emerge, up-to-date data on viral kinetics are necessary to adjust testing strategies for reliable early detection of infections.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors report grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (to RFI), the Ronald and Maxine Linde Center for New Initiatives at the California Institute of Technology (to RFI), and the Jacobs Institute for Molecular Engineering for Medicine (to RFI), as well as a Caltech graduate fellowship (to MMC), two National Institutes of Health Biotechnology Leadership Pre-doctoral Training Program (BLP) fellowships (to MKP and JTB) from Caltech’s Donna and Benjamin M. Rosen Bioengineering Center (T32GM112592), and a National Institutes of Health NIGMS Predoctoral Training Grant (GM008042) (to AW) during the course of the study. RFI is a co-founder, consultant, and a director and has stock ownership of Talis Biomedical Corp. In addition, RFI is an inventor on a series of patents licensed by the University of Chicago to Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. in the context of ddPCR.
Funding Statement
This study is based on research funded in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-023124). The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. This work was also funded by the Ronald and Maxine Linde Center for New Initiatives at the California Institute of Technology and the Jacobs Institute for Molecular Engineering for Medicine. AW is supported by a National Institutes of Health NIGMS Predoctoral Training Grant (GM008042) and a UCLA DGSOM Geffen Fellowship; MMC is supported by a Caltech Graduate Student Fellowship; and MP and JTB are each partially supported by National Institutes of Health Biotechnology Leadership Pre-doctoral Training Program (BLP) fellowships from the Donna and Benjamin M. Rosen Bioengineering Center (Caltech) (T32GM112592).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
California Institute of Technology IRB
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available on CaltechDATA at https://data.caltech.edu/records/1942
