Abstract
Background In March 2020, a directive to halt all elective and non-urgent procedures was issued in Ontario, Canada because of COVID-19. The directive caused a temporary slowdown of screening programs including surveillance colonoscopies for colorectal cancer (CRC). Our goal was to determine if there was a difference in patient and tumour characteristics between CRC patients treated surgically prior to the COVID-19 directive compared to CRC patients treated after the slowdown.
Methods CRC resections collected within the Champlain catchment area of eastern Ontario in the six months prior to COVID-19 (August 1, 2019-January 31, 2020) were compared to CRC resections collected in the six months post-COVID-19 slowdown (August 1, 2020-January 31, 2021). Clinical (e.g. gender, patient age, tumour site, clinical presentation) and pathological (tumour size, tumour stage, nodal stage, lymphovascular invasion) features were evaluated using chi square tests, T-tests and Mann-Whitney tests where appropriate.
Results 343 CRC specimens were identified (175 pre-COVID-19, 168 post-COVID-19 slowdown). CRC patients treated surgically post-COVID-19 slowdown had larger tumours (44 mm vs. 35 mm; p = 0.0048) and were more likely to have presented emergently (24% vs .10%; p < 0.001). While there was a trend towards higher tumour stage, nodal stage, and clinical stage, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Other demographic and pathologic variables including patient gender, age, and tumour site were similar between the two cohorts.
Interpretation The COVID-19 slowdown resulted in a shift in the severity of disease experienced by CRC patients in Ontario. Pandemic planning in the future should consider the long-term consequences to cancer diagnosis and management.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board (20200331-01H).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding Statement: There is no funding to declare.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
This study was approved by the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board (20200331-01H).
Data Availability
Data not available.
